Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis: technical and clinical outcomes in a large thrombolysis trial. GUSTO-1 Angiographic Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries
AM Ross,
CF Lundergan,
SC Rohrbeck,
DH Boyle,
M van den Brand,
CH Buller,
DR Holmes Jr,
and
JS Reiner
George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the angiographic outcome, complication rates and clinical features of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: "Rescue angioplasty" refers to mechanical reopening of an occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) after failed intravenous thrombolysis. Although the procedure is commonly performed, data describing its technical and clinical outcome are sparse. Early reports suggested that rescue PTCA is less often successful and produces more complications than primary PTCA. Other reports have described beneficial effects of successful rescue PTCA but adverse outcomes when PTCA is unsuccessful. METHODS: Using data from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-1) angiographic substudy, we compared clinical and angiographic outcomes of 198 patients selected for a rescue PTCA attempt with those of 266 patients with failed thrombolysis but managed conservatively and, for reference, with those of 1,058 patients with successful thrombolysis. RESULTS: Patients offered rescue PTCA had more impaired left ventricular function than those in whom closed vessels were managed conservatively. Rescue successfully opened 88.4% of closed arteries, with 68% attaining Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow. The interventions did not increase catheterization laboratory or postprocedural complication rates. Multivariate analysis identified severe heart failure to be a determinant of a failed rescue attempt. Successful rescue PTCA resulted in superior left ventricular function and 30-day mortality outcomes, comparable to outcomes in patients with closed IRAs managed conservatively, but less favorable than in patients in whom thrombolytic therapy was initially successful. The mortality rate after a failed rescue attempt was 30.4%; however, five of the seven patients who died after failed rescue PTCA were in cardiogenic shock before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue PTCA tends to be selected for patients with clinical predictors of a poor outcome. It is effective in restoring patency. Patients who die after a failed rescue attempt are often already in extremis before the angioplasty attempt.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Carver, S. Rafelt, A. H. Gershlick, K. L. Fairbrother, S. Hughes, R. Wilcox, and for the REACT Investigators
Longer-Term Follow-Up of Patients Recruited to the REACT (Rescue Angioplasty Versus Conservative Treatment or Repeat Thrombolysis) Trial.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 7, 2009;
54(2):
118 - 126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Gershlick, A. Stephens-Lloyd, S. Hughes, K. R. Abrams, S. E. Stevens, N. G. Uren, A. de Belder, J. Davis, M. Pitt, A. Banning, et al.
Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 29, 2005;
353(26):
2758 - 2768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A G C Sutton, P G Campbell, R Graham, D J A Price, J C Gray, E D Grech, J A Hall, A A Harcombe, R A Wright, R H Smith, et al.
One year results of the Middlesbrough early revascularisation to limit infarction (MERLIN) trial
Heart,
October 1, 2005;
91(10):
1330 - 1337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Steg, L. Francois, B. Iung, D. Himbert, P. Aubry, P. Charlier, H. Benamer, L. J. Feldman, and J.-M. Juliard
Long-term clinical outcomes after rescue angioplasty are not different from those of successful thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
September 2, 2005;
26(18):
1831 - 1837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Schomig, G. Ndrepepa, J. Mehilli, J. Dirschinger, S. G. Nekolla, C. Schmitt, S. Martinoff, M. Seyfarth, M. Schwaiger, A. Kastrati, et al.
A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 16, 2004;
44(10):
2073 - 2079.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Heggunje, K. J. Harjai, G. W. Stone, R. H. Mehta, D. L. Marsalese, J. A. Boura, W. W. O'Neill, and C. L. Grines
Procedural success versus clinical risk status in determining discharge of patients after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 6, 2004;
44(7):
1400 - 1407.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. C. Sutton, P. G. Campbell, R. Graham, D. J. A. Price, J. C. Gray, E. D. Grech, J. A. Hall, A. A. Harcombe, R. A. Wright, R. H. Smith, et al.
A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 21, 2004;
44(2):
287 - 296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Grines and W. W. O'Neill
Rescue angioplasty: Does the concept need to be rescued?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 21, 2004;
44(2):
297 - 299.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.A. Alhadi and K.A.A. Fox
Do we need additional markers of myocyte necrosis: the potential value of heart fatty-acid-binding protein
QJM,
April 1, 2004;
97(4):
187 - 198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Tadros, M. A. Islam, A. Mirza, J. C. Blankenship, and E. A. Iliadis
Angiographic and Long-Term Outcomes of "Rescue" Stenting versus PTCA in Failed Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Angiology,
March 1, 2004;
55(2):
169 - 176.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. S. Mahadevan, D. McCarty, and A. A. J. Adgey
Platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockers for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, alone or as adjunct to other rescue therapies
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2002;
23(19):
1490 - 1491.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ronner, R.T. van Domburg, M.J.B.M. van den Brand, P.J. de Feyter, D.P. Foley, W.J. van der Giessen, P.W. Serruys, and M.L. Simoons
Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, alone or as adjunct to other rescue therapies. A single centre retrospective analysis of 548 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2002;
23(19):
1529 - 1537.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K P Balachandran, J Miller, A C H Pell, B D Vallance, and K G Oldroyd
Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: results from a district general hospital
Postgrad. Med. J.,
June 1, 2002;
78(920):
330 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Buller and R. G. Carere
New advances in the management of acute coronary syndromes: 3. The role of catheter-based procedures
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
January 1, 2002;
166(1):
51 - 61.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. de Lemos and E. Braunwald
ST segment resolution as a tool for assessing the efficacy of reperfusion therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 1, 2001;
38(5):
1283 - 1294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Loubeyre, T Lefevre, Y Louvard, P Dumas, J.-F Piechaud, J.-J Lanore, J.-F Angellier, J.-Y Le Tarnec, G Karrillon, A Margenet, et al.
Outcome after combined reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, combining pre-hospital thrombolysis with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention and stent
Eur. Heart J.,
July 1, 2001;
22(13):
1128 - 1135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2001;
37(8):
2239 - 2239.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.D. Kovac and A.H. Gershlick
How should we detect and manage failed thrombolysis?
Eur. Heart J.,
March 2, 2001;
22(6):
450 - 457.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A de Belder
CORONARY DISEASE: Acute myocardial infarction: failed thrombolysis
Heart,
January 1, 2001;
85(1):
104 - 112.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A G C Sutton, P G Campbell, E D Grech, D J A Price, A Davies, J A Hall, M J Stewart, and M A de Belder
Failure of thrombolysis: experience with a policy of early angiography and rescue angioplasty for electrocardiographic evidence of failed thrombolysis
Heart,
August 1, 2000;
84(2):
197 - 204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Goldman and M. J. Eisenberg
Identification and Management of Patients with Failed Thrombolysis after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med,
April 4, 2000;
132(7):
556 - 565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Ross, K. S. Coyne, J. S. Reiner, S. W. Greenhouse, C. Fink, A. Frey, E. Moreyra, M. Traboulsi, N. Racine, A. L. Riba, et al.
A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 1999;
34(7):
1954 - 1962.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M A DE BELDER and J A HALL
Infarct angioplasty
Heart,
October 1, 1999;
82(4):
399 - 401.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Brodison, R. S More, and A. Chauhan
Stents in medicine: The role of coronary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction
Postgrad. Med. J.,
October 1, 1999;
75(888):
591 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 1, 1999;
33(6):
1756 - 1824.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|