JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:1367-1371
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, Y
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, Y
Right arrow Articles by Sunagawa, K

Noninvasive differential diagnosis between chronic pulmonary thromboembolism and primary pulmonary hypertension by means of Doppler ultrasound measurement

Y Nakayama, M Sugimachi, N Nakanishi, H Takaki, Y Okano, T Satoh, K Miyatake, and K Sunagawa

Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to differentiate chronic pulmonary thromboembolism (CPTE) from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) by using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound techniques. BACKGROUND: A recent investigation in our laboratory has indicated that the pulmonary artery (PA) pressure waveform conveys significant information that can be used to differentiate CPTE from PPH. Pulse pressure was markedly larger in CPTE than in PPH, indicating that the major occlusive site is central in CPTE and peripheral in PPH. METHODS: In 19 patients with CPTE and 16 patients with PPH, we estimated PA systolic pressure and diastolic pressure from the velocities of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation, respectively. RESULTS: Estimated systolic pressure was not significantly different between CPTE and PPH (mean [+/-SD] 81+/-20 and 79+/-21 mm Hg, respectively, p=NS). Pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure was higher in CPTE than in PPH (0.82+/-0.05 vs. 0.63+/-0.10, respectively, p < 0.01). Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure was also higher in CPTE than in PPH (1.65+/-0.30 vs. 0.94+/-0.25, respectively, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that pulse pressure normalized by systolic pressure separated CPTE from PPH, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. Pulse pressure normalized by mean pressure also separated them, with a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: Normalized pulse pressures estimated from Doppler ultrasound measurements enable us to noninvasively differentiate between CPTE and PPH.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
R. Naeije and S. Huez
Right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension: physiological concepts
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H5 - H9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Hardziyenka, H. J. Reesink, B. J. Bouma, H.A.C.M. R. de Bruin-Bon, M. E. Campian, M. W.T. Tanck, R. B.A. van den Brink, J. J. Kloek, H. L. Tan, and P. Bresser
A novel echocardiographic predictor of in-hospital mortality and mid-term haemodynamic improvement after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2007; 28(7): 842 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. McGoon, D. Gutterman, V. Steen, R. Barst, D. C. McCrory, T. A. Fortin, and J. E. Loyd
Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1_suppl): 14S - 34S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Peacock, R. Naeije, N. Galie, and J.T. Reeves
End points in pulmonary arterial hypertension: the way forward
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 947 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.