JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:1134-1141
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elsasser, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elsasser, A

Lack of adenosine causes myocardial refractoriness

AM Vogt, H Ando, M Arras, and A Elsasser

Max-Planck-Institute for Physiological and Clinical Research (W.G. Kerckhoff-Institute), Department of Experimental Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany. Achim_Vogt@ukl.uni-heidelberg.de

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the myocardial mechanisms causing refractoriness to ischemic preconditioning in pigs. BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning in the pig vanishes after 60 min and cannot be reinstated by a second cycle of brief coronary occlusions at this time point. Ischemic preconditioning has been shown to be mediated by adenosine A1-receptors. Because myocardial adenosine production during ischemia ceases as the number of repeated brief ischemic episodes increases, we hypothesized that this lack of adenosine may cause this myocardial refractoriness. METHODS: In open chest pigs, ischemic preconditioning was achieved by repeated brief coronary occlusions. Myocardial adenosine content was assessed by high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of serial myocardial biopsy samples; infarct size (percent infarcted area of the area at risk) was determined using tetrazolium salts. RESULTS: Ischemic preconditioning by two cycles of occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (10 min) and reperfusion (30 min) decreased infarct size ([mean +/- SEM] 40.4+/-2.9%; control: 76.9+/-1.8%, p < 0.001). Prolonging the second reperfusion period to 60 min caused ischemic preconditioning to vanish (79.0+/-0.5%) and caused refractoriness to a second cycle of preconditioning (70.0+/-2.0%). Myocardial adenosine content increased only during the first coronary occlusion (baseline: 110.9+/-42.0 nmol/g dry weight; first coronary occlusion: 1,686.2+/-244.1, p < 0.001) but not during subsequent coronary occlusions. In refractory myocardium, intramyocardial microinfusion of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA [0.3 mmol/liter]) again decreased infarct size (27.4+/-7.0%, p < 0.001 vs. control). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial refractoriness may be caused by the inability to produce adenosine endogenously. In refractory myocardium, application of CHA reinduces cardioprotection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Liem, M. te Lintel Hekkert, O. C. Manintveld, F. Boomsma, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
Myocardium tolerant to an adenosine-dependent ischemic preconditioning stimulus can still be protected by stimuli that employ alternative signaling pathways
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1165 - H1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Vogt, M. Poolman, C. Ackermann, M. Yildiz, W. Schoels, D. A. Fell, and W. Kubler
Regulation of Glycolytic Flux in Ischemic Preconditioning. A STUDY EMPLOYING METABOLIC CONTROL ANALYSIS
J. Biol. Chem., June 28, 2002; 277(27): 24411 - 24419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.