Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:804-808
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braun, S
Right arrow Articles by Goldbourt, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braun, S
Right arrow Articles by Goldbourt, U

Calcium channel blocking agents and risk of cancer in patients with coronary heart disease. Benzafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Research Group

S Braun, V Boyko, S Behar, H Reicher-Reiss, S Laniado, E Kaplinsky, and U Goldbourt

Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel. braun@netvision.net.il

OBJECTIVES: This analysis sought to estimate the risk ratio for cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality associated with the use of calcium channel blocking agents (CCBs) in a large group of patients with chronic coronary heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: Recent publications contend that the use of short-acting CCBs may double the risk of cancer incidence and possibly increase mortality in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Cancer incidence data were obtained for 11,575 patients screened for the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study, one-half of whom were treated at the time of screening with CCBs, over a mean follow-up period of 2.8 years. Cause-specific mortality was available through September 1996 (mean follow-up 5.2 years). The statistical power of detecting an odds ratio > or = 1.5 (given the cancer incidence rate of 2.1 in the nonusers of CCBs) was 0.91. The power declined to 0.77, 0.54 and 0.41, with declining odds ratios of 1.4, 1.3 and 1.25, respectively. RESULTS: Of 246 incident cancer cases, 129 occurred among the users (2.3%) and 117 among nonusers of CCBs (2.1%). After adjustment for age, gender and smoking, the odds ratio estimates for all cancers combined was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 1.37) for CCB users relative to nonusers. The adjusted risk ratio for all-cause mortality for age, gender and smoking and pertinent prognostic clinical characteristics was estimated at 0.94 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.04). The adjusted risk ratio for cancer-related mortality was 1.03 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CHD treated with CCBs exhibited a similar risk of cancer incidence and total and cancer-related mortality compared with nonusers of CCBs. This analysis provides a certain assurance that CCB use in middle-aged and elderly patients with CHD is not associated with a meaningful difference in cancer incidence and related mortality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E Grossman, F.H Messerli, and U Goldbourt
Antihypertensive therapy and the risk of malignancies
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2001; 22(15): 1343 - 1352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. R. Kizer and S. E. Kimmel
Epidemiologic Review of the Calcium Channel Blocker Drugs: An Up-to-date Perspective on the Proposed Hazards
Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1145 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. A. Grace and A.J. Camm
Voltage-gated calcium-channels and antiarrhythmic drug action
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2000; 45(1): 43 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. P. Mason
Calcium channel blockers, apoptosis and cancer: is there a biologic relationship?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 1857 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Reassuring Data on Calcium Blockers and Cancer
Journal Watch (General), April 10, 1998; 1998(410): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Reassuring Data on Calcium Blockers and Cancer
Journal Watch (General), March 31, 1998; 1998(331): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement