JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:654-660
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shively, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shively, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, R.

Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis: relation to valve morphology

BK Shively, GA Charlton, MH Crawford, and RK Chaney

Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico and Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Medical Center 87131, USA. bshively@salud.unm.edu

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an index of flow dependence of valve area in aortic valve (AoV) stenosis and to determine whether this index is related to structural characteristics of the diseased valve. BACKGROUND: Many studies of AoV stenosis using Gorlin or continuity equation methods have demonstrated flow dependence (an increase in valve area with increased flow). Variation in flow dependence between patients despite similar flow rates remains unexplained. METHODS: Dobutamine Doppler echocardiography was used to calculate flow rate and valve area by the continuity equation in 27 patients with aortic stenosis. For each patient the slope of the regression line of valve area to flow rate was determined (slope of flow dependence). Transesophageal echocardiography was used to evaluate features of valve morphology potentially related to the etiology of AoV stenosis and the mechanism of flow dependence. RESULTS: Mean slope of flow dependence was 0.28 cm2/100 ml per s (range -0.06 to 0.53); flow dependence was significantly >0 in 21 patients and was lower for bicuspid valves (slope 0.21 cm2/100 ml per s) than for tricuspid valves with <10% commissural fusion (slope 0.35, p < 0.01). Off-center/ovoid orifices demonstrated the least flow dependence (slope 0.19), whereas star-shaped orifices showed the most (slope 0.36, p < 0.01). Greater flow dependence was related to a lower percentage of commissural fusion (r = -0.46, p = 0.02) as well as diffuse sclerosis, primarily involving the cusp bodies, rather than localized sclerosis, with involvement of cusp margins. CONCLUSIONS: The slope of flow dependence of valve area in AoV stenosis differs markedly between patients. More flow dependence was associated with tricuspid valves and the morphologic features characteristic of calcific AoV stenosis, whereas less flow dependence was associated with bicuspid valves and the features of rheumatic disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
A. M. Greve and K. Wachtell
Review: Does lowering cholesterol have an impact on the progression of aortic stenosis?
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2008; 2(4): 277 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S. H Little, K.-L. Chan, and I. G Burwash
Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis
Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot
Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot
Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 14, 2005; (2005) j.jacc.2005.05.100v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Das, H. Rimington, N. Smeeton, and J. Chambers
Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1254 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Bermejo, R. Odreman, J. Feijoo, M. M. Moreno, P. Gomez-Moreno, and M. A. Garcia-Fernandez
Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis:a comparative test-based analysis of outcome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 142 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg
Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy
Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand
Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept
Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, J. Jobin, P. Cartier, G. Honos, and L.-G. Durand
Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1609 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F ANTONINI-CANTERIN, P FAGGIANO, D ZANUTTINI, and F RIBICHINI
Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis?
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 9 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.