|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:654-660 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico and Albuquerque Veterans Affairs Medical Center 87131, USA. bshively@salud.unm.edu
OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an index of flow dependence of valve area in aortic valve (AoV) stenosis and to determine whether this index is related to structural characteristics of the diseased valve. BACKGROUND: Many studies of AoV stenosis using Gorlin or continuity equation methods have demonstrated flow dependence (an increase in valve area with increased flow). Variation in flow dependence between patients despite similar flow rates remains unexplained. METHODS: Dobutamine Doppler echocardiography was used to calculate flow rate and valve area by the continuity equation in 27 patients with aortic stenosis. For each patient the slope of the regression line of valve area to flow rate was determined (slope of flow dependence). Transesophageal echocardiography was used to evaluate features of valve morphology potentially related to the etiology of AoV stenosis and the mechanism of flow dependence. RESULTS: Mean slope of flow dependence was 0.28 cm2/100 ml per s (range -0.06 to 0.53); flow dependence was significantly >0 in 21 patients and was lower for bicuspid valves (slope 0.21 cm2/100 ml per s) than for tricuspid valves with <10% commissural fusion (slope 0.35, p < 0.01). Off-center/ovoid orifices demonstrated the least flow dependence (slope 0.19), whereas star-shaped orifices showed the most (slope 0.36, p < 0.01). Greater flow dependence was related to a lower percentage of commissural fusion (r = -0.46, p = 0.02) as well as diffuse sclerosis, primarily involving the cusp bodies, rather than localized sclerosis, with involvement of cusp margins. CONCLUSIONS: The slope of flow dependence of valve area in AoV stenosis differs markedly between patients. More flow dependence was associated with tricuspid valves and the morphologic features characteristic of calcific AoV stenosis, whereas less flow dependence was associated with bicuspid valves and the features of rheumatic disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Greve and K. Wachtell Review: Does lowering cholesterol have an impact on the progression of aortic stenosis? Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2008; 2(4): 277 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H Little, K.-L. Chan, and I. G Burwash Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 848 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 3, 2006; 47(1): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kadem, R. Rieu, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, and P. Pibarot Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 14, 2005; (2005) j.jacc.2005.05.100v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Das, H. Rimington, N. Smeeton, and J. Chambers Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1254 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bermejo, R. Odreman, J. Feijoo, M. M. Moreno, P. Gomez-Moreno, and M. A. Garcia-Fernandez Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis:a comparative test-based analysis of outcome J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 142 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, J. Jobin, P. Cartier, G. Honos, and L.-G. Durand Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1609 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F ANTONINI-CANTERIN, P FAGGIANO, D ZANUTTINI, and F RIBICHINI Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |