|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:558-566 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Andreas Gruentzig Cardiovascular Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare outcomes of patients treated in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) and New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registries. BACKGROUND: Coronary angioplasty has numerous shortcomings. New devices for performing coronary interventions have been introduced in an effort to improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Under the sponsorship of the NHLBI, a registry of consecutive patients treated with PTCA during 1985 to 1986 was established. In 1990, the NHLBI funded a second registry, the NACI. The two registries used the same data coordinating center to collect detailed baseline and follow-up information. RESULTS: Patients enrolled in the NACI registry were older, had undergone more previous bypass surgery procedures and had more stenoses located in bypass grafts than patients in the NHLBI PTCA registry. Procedural success was achieved in 72.1% and 82.6% of patients in the PTCA and NACI registries, respectively; however, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 1.0% versus 1.8% and 3.1% versus 5.9% for the PTCA versus NACI registries, respectively. After risk adjustment, there was no difference in 1-year mortality. Rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were 21.5% for the PTCA registry and 24.2% for the NACI registry. NACI registry patients had a higher risk for TLR and the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction or revascularization (relative risk 1.28 and 1.23, respectively). However, the NACI registry patients who received stents tended to have a lower adjusted TLR rate. CONCLUSIONS: This comparative study found no overall superiority of these newer devices in terms of patient survival or freedom from TLR after adjustment for baseline risk profiles. Although technologic improvements (especially improved stenting) continue, these observations highlight the importance of careful assessment of clinical results in the broad population of patients in whom interventions are used.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Holmes Jr and D. O. Williams Catheter-Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Past, Present, and Future Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 60 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Qureshi, R. D. Safian, C. L. Grines, J. A. Goldstein, D. C. Westveer, S. Glazier, M. Balasubramanian, and W. W. O'Neill Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1890 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Levine, M. J. Kern, P. B. Berger, D. L. Brown, L. W. Klein, D. J. Kereiakes, T. A. Sanborn, A. K. Jacobs, and for the American Heart Association Diagnostic and Management of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Ann Intern Med, July 15, 2003; 139(2): 123 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. J. Chamuleau, R. A. Tio, C. C. de Cock, E. D. de Muinck, N. H. J. Pijls, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, M. Meuwissen, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, A. de Jong, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 852 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Meisel, V. Afshar-Kharghan, I. Cascorbi, M. Laule, V. Stangl, S. B. Felix, G. Baumann, J. A. Lopez, I. Roots, and K. Stangl Role of Kozak sequence polymorphism of platelet glycoprotein Ib{alpha} as a risk factor for coronary artery disease and catheter interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1023 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley, C. A. Velez, W. W. O'Neill, and R. D. Safian Long-term clinical outcome and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 659 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscucci, E. Kline-Rogers, D. Share, M. O'Donnell, A. Maxwell-Eward, W. L. Meengs, P. Kraft, A. C. DeFranco, J. L. Chambers, K. Patel, et al. Simple Bedside Additive Tool for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2000; 35(5_Suppl_B): 35B - 37B. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. McGrath, D. J. Malenka, D. E. Wennberg, S. J. Shubrooks Jr., W. A. Bradley, J. F. Robb, M. A. Kellett Jr., T. J. Ryan Jr., M. J. Hearne, B. Hettleman, et al. Changing outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: A study of 34,752 procedures in Northern New England, 1990 to 1997 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Moscucci, G. T. O'Connor, S. G. Ellis, D. J. Malenka, J. Sievers, E. R. Bates, D. W. M. Muller, S. W. Werns, E. K. Rogers, D. Karavite, et al. Validation of risk adjustment models for in-hospital percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty mortality on an independent data set J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 692 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |