Which variable of stenosis severity best describes the significance of an isolated left anterior descending coronary artery lesion? Correlation between quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary Doppler measurements and high dose dipyridamole echocardiography

Department of Cardiology, CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Section of Milan, Niguarda Hospital, Italy. ifcnigmi@tin.it

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the angiographic or intracoronary Doppler variables of stenosis severity that best correlate with the results of dipyridamole echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary Doppler flow velocity assessments are the commonly used techniques for the objective identification of significant coronary artery stenosis. METHODS: Thirty patients with an isolated lesion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were studied by means of on-line quantitative coronary arteriography, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements and dipyridamole echocardiography 6 months after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The quantitative arteriographic analyses were performed on-line; post-stenotic Doppler flow velocities were measured at baseline and after adenosine infusion. Angiographic and Doppler measurements were compared with the corresponding dipyridamole echocardiographic data and analyzed by discriminant analysis. RESULTS: The dipyridamole echocardiographic response was positive in 11 patients (37%). The best cutoff values for predicting an abnormal echocardiographic response were 1) stenotic flow reserve of 2.8 (p = 0.0001); 2) 59% diameter stenosis (p = 0.0001); 3) minimal lumen diameter of 1.35 mm (p = 0.001); 4) coronary flow reserve of 2.0 (p = 0.0002); and 5) maximal peak velocity of 60 cm/s during hyperemia (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified stenotic flow reserve as the only independent predictor of ischemia during dipyridamole echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Stenotic flow reserve is the variable that best describes the functional significance of an isolated LAD lesion, and a value of 2.8 is the best predictor of a positive dipyridamole echocardiographic response. Furthermore, angiographic variables of stenosis severity relate to echocardiographic test results better than intracoronary Doppler variables.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1321 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Hagendorff, A Werner, D Pfeiffer, and H Becher Estimation of vasodilator response by analysis of Doppler intensity kinetics with myocardial contrast echocardiography using an intravenous standardized bolus administration Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, August 1, 2004; 5(4): 272 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. Miller Coronary flow studies for risk stratification in multivessel disease: A physiologic bridge too far? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 6, 2002; 39(5): 859 - 863. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. J. Chamuleau, M. Meuwissen, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, K. T. Koch, A. de Jong, R. J. de Winter, C. E. Schotborgh, M. Bax, H. J. Verberne, J. G. P. Tijssen, et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestambi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1316 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Hundley, L. D. Hillis, C. A. Hamilton, R. J. Applegate, D. M. Herrington, G. D. Clarke, G. A. Braden, M. S. Thomas, R. A. Lange, R. M. Peshock, et al. Assessment of Coronary Arterial Restenosis With Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Coronary Flow Reserve Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2375 - 2381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kern Coronary Physiology Revisited : Practical Insights From the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Takagi, Y. Tsurumi, Y. Ishii, K. Suzuki, M. Kawana, and H. Kasanuki Clinical Potential of Intravascular Ultrasound for Physiological Assessment of Coronary Stenosis : Relationship Between Quantitative Ultrasound Tomography and Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. G. Hundley, C. A. Hamilton, G. D. Clarke, L. D. Hillis, D. M. Herrington, R. A. Lange, R. J. Applegate, M. S. Thomas, J. Payne, K. M. Link, et al. Visualization and Functional Assessment of Proximal and Middle Left Anterior Descending Coronary Stenoses in Humans With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3248 - 3254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				How to Assess Stenosis Severity? Journal Watch Cardiology, March 31, 1998; 1998(331): 15 - 15. [Full Text]