JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:487-493
© 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tebbe, U
Right arrow Articles by Mlczoch, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tebbe, U
Right arrow Articles by Mlczoch, J

Randomized, double-blind study comparing saruplase with streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the COMPASS Equivalence Trial. Comparison Trial of Saruplase and Streptokinase (COMASS) Investigators

U Tebbe, R Michels, J Adgey, J Boland, A Caspi, B Charbonnier, J Windeler, H Barth, R Groves, GR Hopkins, W Fennell, A Betriu, M Ruda, and J Mlczoch

Klinikum, Lippe-Detmold, Germany.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate the equivalence of saruplase and streptokinase in terms of 30-day mortality. BACKGROUND: The use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction is well established and has been shown to substantially reduce post-myocardial infarction mortality. METHODS: Three thousand eighty-nine patients with symptoms compatible with those of acute myocardial infarction for < 6 h entered the study at a total of 104 centers and were randomized to receive streptokinase (1.5-MU infusion over 60 min) or saruplase (20-mg bolus and 60-mg infusion over 60 min). In the saruplase group, a bolus of heparin (5,000 IU) was administered before saruplase, and a corresponding blinded double-dummy placebo bolus was administered before streptokinase. All patients received intravenous heparin infusions for > or = 24 h starting 30 min after the end of the thrombolytic infusions; the infusions were titrated to maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time at 1.5 to 2.5 times that of normal. RESULTS: Death of any cause up to 30 days after randomization occurred in 88 (5.7%) of 1,542 patients randomized to receive saruplase and 104 (6.7%) of 1,547 patients randomized to receive streptokinase (odds ratio 0.84, p < 0.01 for equivalence). Hemorrhagic strokes occurred more often in patients receiving saruplase (0.9% vs. 0.3%), whereas thromboembolic strokes were more prevalent in the streptokinase-treated patients (0.5% vs. 1.0%). The rate of bleeding was similar in the two treatment groups (10.4% vs. 10.9%). Hypotension and cardiogenic shock occurred less frequently in the saruplase group. Reinfarction rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Saruplase is a clinically safe and effective thrombolytic medication. This profile ranks saruplase favorably among the currently available thrombolytic agents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Schulman, R. J. Beyth, C. Kearon, and M. N. Levine
Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant and Thrombolytic Treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 257S - 298S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
C. S. Hollenbeak, J. P. Fitzgibbons, M. Rossi, D. L. Morris, and P. Stillman
The Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Outcomes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pennsylvania
American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2007; 22(2): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardi, F. Van de Werf, D. Ardissino, A. Betriu, D. V. Cokkinos, E. Falk, K. A.A. Fox, D. Julian, M. Lengyel, F.-J. Neumann, et al.
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 28 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Ronner, R.T. van Domburg, M.J.B.M. van den Brand, P.J. de Feyter, D.P. Foley, W.J. van der Giessen, P.W. Serruys, and M.L. Simoons
Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, alone or as adjunct to other rescue therapies. A single centre retrospective analysis of 548 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2002; 23(19): 1529 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Hamel, G. Pacouret, D. Vincentelli, J. F. Forissier, P. Peycher, J. M. Pottier, and B. Charbonnier
Thrombolysis or Heparin Therapy in Massive Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricular Dilation : Results From a 128-Patient Monocenter Registry
Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 120 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. W. Armstrong and D. Collen
Fibrinolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction : Current Status and New Horizons for Pharmacological Reperfusion, Part 1
Circulation, June 12, 2001; 103(23): 2862 - 2866.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E Lesaffre, E Bluhmki, F Wang-Clow, S Berioli, T Danays, N.L Fox, and F Van de Werf
The general concepts of an equivalence trial, applied to ASSENT-2, a large-scale mortality study comparing two fibrinolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2001; 22(11): 898 - 902.
[PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. M. Ohman, R. A. Harrington, C. P. Cannon, G. Agnelli, J. A. Cairns, and J.W. Kennedy
Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 253S - 277S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E Ronner, H.A.M van Kesteren, P Zijnen, E Altmann, P.G Molhoek, L.R van der Wieken, C.A Cuffie-Jackson, K.L Neuhaus, and M.L Simoons
Safety and efficacy of eptifibatide vs placebo in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. A phase II dose escalation, randomized, double-blind study
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2000; 21(18): 1530 - 1536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
O. Iqbal, H. Messmore, D. Hoppensteadt, J. Fareed, and W. Wehrmacher
State-of-the-Art Review : Thrombolytic Drugs in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 2000; 6(1): 1 - 13.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F.J. Van de Werf
The ideal fibrinolytic: can drug design improve clinical results?
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 1999; 20(20): 1452 - 1458.
[PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
V BERTELE, V TORRI, and S GARATTINI
Inconclusive messages from equivalence trials in thrombolysis
Heart, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 675 - 676.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Danchin, L. Vaur, N. Genes, S. Etienne, M. Angioi, J. Ferrieres, and J.-P. Cambou
Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Primary Coronary Angioplasty or Intravenous Thrombolysis in the "Real World" : One-Year Results From a Nationwide French Survey
Circulation, May 25, 1999; 99(20): 2639 - 2644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Saruplase vs. Streptokinase for AMI
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, May 1, 1998; 1998(501): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. White and F. J. J. Van de Werf
Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1632 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Saruplase - A New Thrombolytic
Journal Watch Cardiology, March 31, 1998; 1998(331): 6 - 6.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.