|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:275-280 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Center for Cardiology Othmarschen, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine and assess factors predictive of the intermediate-term outcome of stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions. BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty of recanalized coronary occlusions is associated with a combined restenosis/reocclusion rate of up to 65%. Adjunctive stenting holds the potential to reduce this rate significantly. However, variables affecting the late angiographic outcome of coronary stenting in the setting of a total occlusion have not been elucidated sufficiently. METHODS: Coronary stenting was performed in 143 consecutive patients with a nonacute total occlusion; 120 of these patients (84%), with a total of 121 occlusions, underwent repeat angiography within 6 months and comprised the study group. High pressure stent implantation aimed to cover the site of the occlusion as well as adjacent diameter stenoses > or = 70% and all possibly induced dissections. Pertinent angiographic and procedural variables obtained at the time of the intervention were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis model to assess their influence on the angiographic outcome at follow-up. RESULTS: Mean preinterventional reference lumen diameter for the 121 vessels was 2.99 +/- 0.53 mm (mean +/- SD); occlusion length ranged from 4 to 44 mm (median of 7.7). After balloon angioplasty, dissections were found in 80% of patients. Lesions were covered with stents a median of 16 mm in length (range 8 to 53). The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) achieved after stenting was 2.89 +/- 0.48 mm. After a median follow-up period of 4.5 months, mean MLD was assessed at 1.91 +/- 0.90 mm, corresponding to a loss index of 0.34 +/- 0.31. There were 27 vessels with a nonocclusive restenosis > or = 50% and 8 with a reocclusion, for a combined restenosis/reocclusion rate of 29%. Factors found to adversely influence angiographic outcome were a post-stenting MLD < or = 2.54 mm, a stented vessel segment length > 16 mm, a balloon/vessel diameter ratio for final stent expansion < or = 1.00 and the presence of a dissection after balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous reports on stand-alone balloon angioplasty, stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions lowers the 6-month restenosis/reocclusion rate to approximately 30%. The late procedural outcome is independently and statistically significantly influenced by the MLD after stenting, the length of the stented vessel segment, the balloon/vessel diameter ratio for final stent expansion and the incidence of dissections after balloon angioplasty.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-C. Fang, Y. T. F. N. Jao, Y. Chen, and S.-P. Wang Coronary Stenting or Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions: The Taiwan Experience (A Single-Center Report) Angiology, September 1, 2005; 56(5): 525 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Werner, A. Krack, G. Schwarz, D. Prochnau, S. Betge, and H. R. Figulla Prevention of lesion recurrence in chronic total coronary occlusions by paclitaxel-eluting stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 21, 2004; 44(12): 2301 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vernhet, R. Demaria, J. M. Juan, M. C. Oliva-Lauraire, J. P. Senac, and M. Dauzat Changes in Wall Mechanics After Endovascular Stenting in the Rabbit Aorta: Comparison of Three Stent Designs Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 803 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Waksman Late Thrombosis After Radiation : Sitting on a Time Bomb Circulation, August 24, 1999; 100(8): 780 - 782. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Meier The stent, the Procrustes for chronic total coronary occlusions? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 1999; 20(16): 1142 - 1144. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schofer, T. Rau, M. Schluter, and D.G. Mathey Restenosis after stenting of matched occluded and non-occluded coronary arteries. Should there be a difference? Eur. Heart J., August 2, 1999; 20(16): 1175 - 1181. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rubartelli, L. Niccoli, E. Verna, C. Giachero, M. Zimarino, A. Fontanelli, C. Vassanelli, L. Campolo, E. Martuscelli, G. Tommasini, et al. Stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty in chronic coronary occlusions: results from the GISSOC trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 90 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |