|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 31:43-49 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Laboratory, Washington Hospital Center, DC, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the clinical, procedural, preinterventional and postinterventional quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz stent placement. BACKGROUND: Although Palmaz-Schatz stent placement reduces restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty, in-stent restenosis remains a major clinical problem. METHODS: QCA and IVUS studies were performed before and after intervention (after stent placement and high pressure adjunct balloon angioplasty) in 382 lesions in 291 patients treated with 476 Palmaz-Schatz stents for whom follow-up QCA data were available 5.5 +/- 4.8 months (mean +/- SD) later. Univariate and multivariate predictors of QCA restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up, follow-up percent diameter stenosis [DS] and follow-up minimal lumen diameter [MLD]) were determined. RESULTS: Three variables were the most consistent predictors of the follow-up angiographic findings: ostial lesion location, IVUS preinterventional lesion site plaque burden (plaque/total arterial area) and IVUS assessment of final lumen dimensions (whether final lumen area or final MLD). All three variables predicted both the primary (binary restenosis) and secondary (follow-up MLD and follow-up DS) end points. In addition, a number of variables predicted one or more but not all the end points: 1) restenosis (IVUS preinterventional lumen and arterial area); 2) follow-up DS (QCA lesion length); and 3) follow-up MLD (QCA lesion length and preinterventional MLD and DS and IVUS preinterventional lumen and arterial area). CONCLUSIONS: Ostial lesion location and IVUS preinterventional plaque burden and postinterventional lumen dimensions were the most consistent predictors of angiographic in-stent restenosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Romagnoli, G. M. Sangiorgi, J. Cosgrave, E. Guillet, and A. Colombo Drug-Eluting Stenting: The Case for Post-Dilation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 22 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gupta, F. Al-Ali, A. J. Thomas, M. B. Horowitz, T. Barrow, N. A. Vora, K. Uchino, M. D. Hammer, L. R. Wechsler, and T. G. Jovin Safety, Feasibility, and Short-Term Follow-Up of Drug-Eluting Stent Placement in the Intracranial and Extracranial Circulation Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2562 - 2566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Clark, S. Lessio, M. O'Donoghue, C. Tsalamandris, R. Schainfeld, and K. Rosenfield Mechanisms and Predictors of Carotid Artery Stent Restenosis: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2390 - 2396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-K. Hong, G. S. Mintz, C. W. Lee, D.-W. Park, B.-R. Choi, K.-H. Park, Y.-H. Kim, S.-S. Cheong, J.-K. Song, J.-J. Kim, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1305 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nishio, M. Sakurai, T. Kusuyama, M. Shigemitsu, T. Fukui, K. Kawamura, S. Itoh, N. Konno, and T. Katagiri A Randomized Comparison of Pioglitazone to Inhibit Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 101 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sahara, H. Kirigaya, Y. Oikawa, J. Yajima, K. Nagashima, H. Hara, K. Ogasawara, and T. Aizawa Soft plaque detected on intravascular ultrasound is the strongest predictor of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2004; 25(22): 2026 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iakovou, L. Ge, I. Michev, G. M. Sangiorgi, M. Montorfano, F. Airoldi, A. Chieffo, G. Stankovic, G. Vitrella, M. Carlino, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 967 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sonoda, Y. Morino, J. Ako, M. Terashima, A. H. M. Hassan, H. N. Bonneau, M. B. Leon, J. W. Moses, P. G. Yock, Y. Honda, et al. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1959 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iakovou, G. S. Mintz, G. Dangas, A. Abizaid, R. Mehran, Y. Kobayashi, A. J. Lansky, E. D. Aymong, E. Nikolsky, G. W. Stone, et al. Increased CK-MB release is a "trade-off" for optimal stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1900 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sahara, H. Kirigaya, Y. Oikawa, J. Yajima, K. Ogasawara, H. Satoh, K. Nagashima, H. Hara, Y. Nakatsu, and T. Aizawa Arterial remodeling patterns before intervention predict diffuse in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1731 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Gunn, A C Morton, C Wales, C M H Newman, D C Crossman, and D C Cumberland Drug eluting stents: maximising benefit and minimising cost Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 127 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Oemrawsingh, G. S. Mintz, M. J. Schalij, A. H. Zwinderman, J. W. Jukema, and E. E.v.d. Wall Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance Improves Angiographic and Clinical Outcome of Stent Implantation for Long Coronary Artery Stenoses: Final Results of a Randomized Comparison With Angiographic Guidance (TULIP Study) Circulation, January 7, 2003; 107(1): 62 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Spanos, G. Stankovic, J. Tobis, and A. Colombo The challenge of in-stent restenosis: insights from intravascular ultrasound Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2003; 24(2): 138 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. P. Casserly, H. D. Aronow, P. Schoenhagen, H. Tsutsui, J. Popovich, M. Goormastic, J. J. Popma, S. E. Nissen, and E. M. Tuzcu Relationship between residual atheroma burden and neointimal growth in patients undergoing stenting: Analysis of the atherectomy before MULTI-LINK improves lumen gain and clinical outcomes trial intravascular ultrasound substudy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1573 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Farb, D. K. Weber, F. D. Kolodgie, A. P. Burke, and R. Virmani Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans Circulation, June 25, 2002; 105(25): 2974 - 2980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yoshitomi, S. Kojima, M. Yano, Y. Matsumoto, T. Sugi, M. Saotome, K.-e Tanaka, M. Endo, and M. Kuramochi Peristent Tissue Proliferation of Multilink Stents Is Dependent on Preprocedural Plaque Area: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis Angiology, May 1, 2002; 53(3): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Ajani, R. Waksman, D.-H. Cha, L. Gruberg, L. F. Satler, A. D. Pichard, and K. M. Kent The impact of lesion length and reference vessel diameter on angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization in treating in-stent restenosis with radiation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1290 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Briguori, J. Tobis, T. Nishida, M. Vaghetti, R. Albiero, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo Discrepancy between angiography and intravascular ultrasound when analysing small coronary arteries Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 247 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Lowe, S. N. Oesterle, and L. M. Khachigian Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 183 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoffmann, P. Haager, G.S. Mintz, G. Kerckhoff, R. Schwarz, A. Franke, J. Vom Dahl, and P. Hanrath The impact of high pressure vs low pressure stent implantation on intimal hyperplasia and follow-up lumen dimensions; results of a randomized trial Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2015 - 2024. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Fearon, J. Luna, H. Samady, E. R. Powers, T. Feldman, N. Dib, E. M. Tuzcu, M. W. Cleman, T. M. Chou, D. J. Cohen, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve Compared With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Optimizing Stent Deployment Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1917 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Park, M.-K. Hong, C. W. Lee, J.-J. Kim, J.-K. Song, D.-H. Kang, S.-W. Park, and G. S. Mintz Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: Effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1054 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kobayashi, Y. Honda, L. G. Christie, P. S. Teirstein, S. R. Bailey, C. L. Brown III, R. V. Matthews, A. C. De Franco, R. S. Schwartz, S. Goldberg, et al. Long-term vessel response to a self-expanding coronary stent: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the ASSURE trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1329 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Nissen and P. Yock Intravascular Ultrasound : Novel Pathophysiological Insights and Current Clinical Applications Circulation, January 30, 2001; 103(4): 604 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Endo, H. Hirayama, O. Yoshida, T. Arakawa, T. Akima, T. Yamada, and M. Nanasato Arterial remodeling influences the development of intimal hyperplasia after stent implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Roguin and R. Beyar Small vessel stenting is safe, but still waiting for a well-proven antirestenotic effect Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2000; 21(21): 1732 - 1734. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoffmann and G.S. Mintz Coronary in-stent restenosis--predictors, treatment and prevention Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2000; 21(21): 1739 - 1749. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takagi, T. Akasaka, A. Yamamuro, Y. Honda, T. Hozumi, S. Morioka, and K. Yoshida Troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: A serial intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1529 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Al Suwaidi, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr Coronary Artery Stents JAMA, October 11, 2000; 284(14): 1828 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hibi, A. Takagi, X. Zhang, T.-J. Teo, H. N. Bonneau, P. G. Yock, and P. J. Fitzgerald Feasibility of a Novel Blood Noise Reduction Algorithm to Enhance Reproducibility of Ultra-High-Frequency Intravascular Ultrasound Images Circulation, October 3, 2000; 102(14): 1657 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takagi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, S. Kaji, T. Kawamoto, Y. Honda, A. Yamamuro, T. Hozumi, and S. Morioka Hyperinsulinemia during oral glucose tolerance test is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in nondiabetic patients: A serial intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 731 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Fitzgerald, A. Oshima, M. Hayase, J. A. Metz, S. R. Bailey, D. S. Baim, M. W. Cleman, E. Deutsch, D. J. Diver, M. B. Leon, et al. Final Results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) Study Circulation, August 1, 2000; 102(5): 523 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Di Mario and E. Karvouni The bigger, the better: true also for in-stent restenosis? Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2000; 21(9): 710 - 711. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. de Feyter, P. Kay, C. Disco, and P. W. Serruys Reference Chart Derived From Post-Stent-Implantation Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of 6-Month Expected Restenosis on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Circulation, October 26, 1999; 100(17): 1777 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, S. Elezi, J. Dirschinger, J. Mehilli, H. Schuhlen, R. Blasini, and F.-J. Neumann Prognostic Value of the Modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stenosis Morphology Classification for Long-Term Angiographic and Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, September 21, 1999; 100(12): 1285 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, B. R. Brodie, J. J. Griffin, C. Costantini, M. C. Morice, F. G. St. Goar, P. A. Overlie, J. J. Popma, J. McDonnell, D. Jones, et al. Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Primary Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction : The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Stent Pilot Trial Circulation, March 30, 1999; 99(12): 1548 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Prati, C. Di Mario, I. Moussa, B. Reimers, M. T. Mallus, A. Parma, E. Lioy, and A. Colombo In-Stent Neointimal Proliferation Correlates With the Amount of Residual Plaque Burden Outside the Stent : An Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, March 2, 1999; 99(8): 1011 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heckenkamp and G. M. Lamuraglia Intimal Hyperplasia, Arterial Remodeling, and Restenosis: An Overview Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1999; 11(2): 71 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Elezi, A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, M. Hadamitzky, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig Vessel Size and Long-Term Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, November 3, 1998; 98(18): 1875 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schiele, N. Meneveau, A. Vuillemenot, D. D. Zhang, S. Gupta, M. Mercier, N. Danchin, B. Bertrand, J.-P. Bassand, and on behalf of the RESIST Study Group Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies--with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 320 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |