Outcome with calcium channel antagonists after myocardial infarction: a community-based study

Department of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. jleitch@ozemail.com.au

OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the risk of death and recurrent myocardial infarction associated with the use of calcium antagonists after myocardial infarction in a population-based cohort study. BACKGROUND: Calcium antagonists are commonly prescribed after myocardial infarction, but their long-term effects are not well established. METHODS: Patients 25 to 69 years old with a suspected myocardial infarction were identified and followed up through a community-based register of myocardial infarction and cardiac death (part of the World Health Organization Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease [MONICA] Project in Newcastle, Australia). Data were collected by review of medical records, in-hospital interview and review of death certificates. RESULTS: From 1989 to 1993, 3,982 patients with a nonfatal suspected myocardial infarction were enrolled in the study. At hospital discharge, 1,001 patients were treated with beta-adrenergic blocking agents, 923 with calcium antagonists, 711 with both beta-blockers and calcium antagonists and 1,346 with neither drug. Compared with patients given beta-blockers, patients given calcium antagonists were more likely to suffer myocardial infarction or cardiac death (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 1.9), cardiac death (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.7) and death from all causes (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6). Compared with patients given neither beta-blockers nor calcium antagonists, patients given calcium antagonists were not at increased risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.3), cardiac death (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2) or death from all causes (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.3). No excess in risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death was observed among patients taking verapamil (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6), diltiazem (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.4) or nifedipine (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.2) compared with patients taking neither calcium antagonists nor beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with randomized trial data showing benefit from beta-blockers after myocardial infarction and no effect on the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death with the use of calcium antagonists. Comparisons between beta-blockers and calcium antagonists favor beta-blockers because of the beneficial effects of beta-blockers and not because of adverse effects of calcium antagonists.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. O. Adesanya, J. A. de Lemos, N. B. Greilich, and C. W. Whitten Management of Perioperative Myocardial Infarction in Noncardiac Surgical Patients Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 584 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. S. Dhalla, M. R. Dent, P. S. Tappia, R. Sethi, J. Barta, and R. K. Goyal Subcellular Remodeling as a Viable Target for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2006; 11(1): 31 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Zaugg, M. C. Schaub, T. Pasch, and D. R. Spahn Modulation of {beta}-adrenergic receptor subtype activities in perioperative medicine: mechanisms and sites of action Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 101 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Kizer and S. E. Kimmel Epidemiologic Review of the Calcium Channel Blocker Drugs: An Up-to-date Perspective on the Proposed Hazards Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1145 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Sear, S. J. Howell, Y. M. Sear, D. Yeates, M. Goldacre, and P. Foex Intercurrent drug therapy and perioperative cardiovascular mortality in elective and urgent/emergency surgical patients{{dagger}} Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Pepine, E. Handberg-Thurmond, R. G. Marks, M. Conlon, R. Cooper-Dehoff, P. Volkers, P. Zellig, and for The INVEST Investigators Rationale and design of the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): an Internet-based randomized trial in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1228 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Califf and J. M. Kramer What Have We Learned From the Calcium Channel Blocker Controversy? Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1529 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF]