Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission: clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries
EB Sgarbossa,
SL Pinski,
EJ Topol,
RM Califf,
A Barbagelata,
SG Goodman,
KB Gates,
CB Granger,
DP Miller,
DA Underwood,
and
GS Wagner
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA. esgarbos@rush.edu
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND: Studies of patients with acute MI and bundle branch block have reported high mortality rates and poor overall prognosis. METHODS: The North American population with acute MI and bundle branch block enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-type plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial was matched by age and Killip class with an equal number of GUSTO-I patients without conduction defects. RESULTS: Of all 26,003 North American patients in GUSTO-I, 420 (1.6%) had left (n = 131) or right (n = 289) bundle branch block. These patients had higher 30-day mortality rates than matched control subjects (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] 1.8) and were more likely to experience cardiogenic shock (19% vs. 11%, p = 0.008, OR 1.78) or atrioventricular block/asystole (30% vs. 19%, p < 0.012, OR 1.57) and to require ventricular pacing (18% vs. 11%, p = 0.006, OR 1.73). Bundle branch block also carried an independent 53% higher risk for 30-day mortality. Thirty-day mortality rates for patients with complete, partial and no reversion of the bundle branch block were 8%, 12% and 20%, respectively (two-tailed chi-square test for trend 5.61, p = 0.02, OR 0.34 for complete reversion, OR 0.55 for partial reversion). CONCLUSIONS: Bundle branch block at hospital admission in patients with acute MI predicts in-hospital complications and poor short-term survival.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. G. Cosío, J.#x. Palacios, A.#x.;n Pastor, and A. Núñez
CHAPTER 2 The Electrocardiogram
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,
January 1, 2009;
2(1):
med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Hawkins, D. Wang, J. J.V. McMurray, M. A. Pfeffer, K. Swedberg, C. B. Granger, S. Yusuf, S. J. Pocock, J. Ostergren, E. L. Michelson, et al.
Prevalence and prognostic impact of bundle branch block in patients with heart failure: Evidence from the CHARM programme
Eur J Heart Fail,
May 1, 2007;
9(5):
510 - 517.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-K. Wong, W. Gao, R. A.H. Stewart, N. van Pelt, J. K. French, P. E.G. Aylward, H. D. White, and on behalf of the Hirulog Early Reperfusion Occlusi
Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction and Right Bundle-Branch Block: Importance of QRS Duration and Early ST-Segment Resolution After Fibrinolytic Therapy
Circulation,
August 22, 2006;
114(8):
783 - 789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bauer, M. A. Watanabe, P. Barthel, R. Schneider, K. Ulm, and G. Schmidt
QRS duration and late mortality in unselected post-infarction patients of the revascularization era
Eur. Heart J.,
February 2, 2006;
27(4):
427 - 433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Di Chiara
Right bundle branch block during the acute phase of myocardial infarction: modern redefinitions of old concepts
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2006;
27(1):
1 - 2.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-K. Wong, R. A.H. Stewart, W. Gao, J. K. French, C. Raffel, H. D. White, and for the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion
Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2006;
27(1):
21 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Eriksson, L. Wilhelmsen, and A. Rosengren
Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years: The Primary Prevention Study in Goteborg, Sweden
Eur. Heart J.,
November 1, 2005;
26(21):
2300 - 2306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-K. Wong, J. K. French, P. E.G. Aylward, R. A.H. Stewart, W. Gao, P. W. Armstrong, F. J.J. Van De Werf, R. J. Simes, O. C. Raffel, C. B. Granger, et al.
Patients With Prolonged Ischemic Chest Pain and Presumed-New Left Bundle Branch Block Have Heterogeneous Outcomes Depending on the Presence of ST-Segment Changes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 5, 2005;
46(1):
29 - 38.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tomoda and N. Aoki
Right Bundle Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting
Angiology,
March 1, 2005;
56(2):
131 - 136.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Terkelsen, J. F. Lassen, B. L. Norgaard, J. C. Gerdes, T. Jensen, L. B.-H. Gotzsche, T. T. Nielsen, and H. R. Andersen
Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort
Eur. Heart J.,
January 1, 2005;
26(1):
18 - 26.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Stenestrand, F. Tabrizi, J. Lindback, A. Englund, M. Rosenqvist, and L. Wallentin
Comorbidity and Myocardial Dysfunction Are the Main Explanations for the Higher 1-Year Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Left Bundle-Branch Block
Circulation,
October 5, 2004;
110(14):
1896 - 1902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Kurisu, I Inoue, T Kawagoe, M Ishihara, Y Shimatani, S Nakamura, M Yoshida, N Mitsuba, and T Hata
Electrocardiographic features in patients with acute myocardial infarction associated with left main coronary artery occlusion
Heart,
September 1, 2004;
90(9):
1059 - 1060.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Zimetbaum and M. E. Josephson
Use of the Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med.,
March 6, 2003;
348(10):
933 - 940.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, P. Houriez, O. Claudon, D. Beurrier, and A. T. de la Chaise
Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction
Europace,
January 1, 2001;
3(3):
187 - 194.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Sgarbossa, S. L. Pinski, G. S. Wagner, M. G. Shlipak, A. S. Go, and W. S. Browner
Left Bundle-Branch Block and the ECG in Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
JAMA,
October 6, 1999;
282(13):
1224 - 1225.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Shlipak, W. L. Lyons, A. S. Go, T. M. Chou, G. T. Evans, and W. S. Browner
Should the Electrocardiogram Be Used to Guide Therapy for Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block and Suspected Myocardial Infarction?
JAMA,
February 24, 1999;
281(8):
714 - 719.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
AMI Patients with Bundle-Branch Block at High Risk
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine,
March 1, 1998;
1998(301):
5 - 5.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|