JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:1264-1269
© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bittl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bittl, J.

Bivalirudin compared with heparin during coronary angioplasty for thrombus-containing lesions

PB Shah, WH Ahmed, P Ganz, and JA Bittl

Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether bivalirudin is more effective than heparin in preventing ischemic complications in high risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for thrombus-containing lesions detected by angiography. BACKGROUND: Heparin is administered during coronary angioplasty to prevent closure of the dilated vessel. Bivalirudin (Hirulog) is a direct thrombin inhibitor that can be safely substituted for heparin during angioplasty. Bivalirudin has several theoretic advantages over heparin as an anticoagulant agent. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of the Hirulog Angioplasty Study in which 4,098 patients with unstable or postinfarction angina were randomized to receive either bivalirudin or heparin during coronary angioplasty. The study group for this analysis consisted of 567 patients who had thrombus-containing lesions on angiography. The primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery or abrupt vessel closure before hospital discharge. RESULTS: Patients with thrombus-containing lesions had a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (5.1% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.03) and abrupt vessel closure (13.6% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001) than those without thrombus. In patients with thrombus-containing lesions, however, the incidence of the primary end point was not different between the bivalirudin and heparin treatment groups. Furthermore, no difference in the incidence of ischemic events at 6 months was seen between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin is not more effective than heparin in preventing ischemic complications in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for thrombus-containing lesions detected by angiography. Other approaches, perhaps involving potent anti-platelet agents, should be considered for patients with thrombus-containing lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. M. Antman
Should Bivalirudin Replace Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions?
JAMA, February 19, 2003; 289(7): 903 - 905.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.