Six-month outcome in patients with myocardial infarction initially admitted to tertiary and nontertiary hospitals. RESCATE Investigators. Recursos Empleados en el Sindrome Coronario Agudo y Tiempos de Espera
J Marrugat,
G Sanz,
R Masia,
V Valle,
L Molina,
M Cardona,
J Sala,
L Seres,
L Szescielinski,
X Albert,
J Lupon,
and
J Alonso
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institut Municipal d'Investigacio Medica, Barcelona, Spain. jaume@imim.es
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether the degree of accessibility to coronary angiography and revascularization results in differing usages or outcomes, or both, in the setting of a high coverage national health system. BACKGROUND: The selective use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures in the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 1,460 consecutive patients with a first MI admitted to four referral teaching hospitals (one with tertiary facilities) were followed up for 6 months after admission. Only patients initially admitted to each of the study hospitals were retained for analysis in the original hospital's cohort. End points were 6-month mortality and readmission for reinfarction, unstable angina, heart failure or severe ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: Patients admitted to the tertiary hospital were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (adjusted relative risk 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.37 to 5.45) than those admitted to the nontertiary sites (use rate: 22.1% for nontertiary care, 55.5% for tertiary care). Revascularization procedures were performed in 21.2% of patients in the tertiary hospital and in 8.3% in the nontertiary hospitals (p < 0.0001). Median delay for emergency coronary angiography was shorter in the tertiary hospital (within 1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.0001). Six-month mortality or readmission rates were similar (23.7% and 24.7% for tertiary and nontertiary care, respectively). After adjustment for comorbidity and disease severity, the relative risk of death or readmission for the tertiary hospital was 1.03 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.53) times that of the nontertiary hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures may be as effective as less restricted use in the management of acute MI.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Zannad
Acute heart failure syndromes: the 'Cinderella' of heart failure research
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
April 1, 2005;
7(suppl_B):
B8 - B12.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Van de Werf, J. M Gore, A. Avezum, D. C Gulba, S. G Goodman, A. Budaj, D. Brieger, K. White, K. A A Fox, K. A Eagle, et al.
Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study
BMJ,
February 26, 2005;
330(7489):
441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Mehta, D. A. Criger, C. B. Granger, K. K. Pieper, R. M. Califf, E. J. Topol, and E. R. Bates
Patient outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without coronary revascularization capability
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 18, 2002;
40(6):
1034 - 1040.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Llevadot, R.P Giugliano, E.M Antman, R.G Wilcox, E.P Gurfinkel, T Henry, C.H McCabe, A Charlesworth, S Thompson, J.C Nicolau, et al.
Availability of on-site catheterization and clinical outcomes in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J.,
November 2, 2001;
22(22):
2104 - 2115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Marrugat, J Ferrieres, R Masia, J Ruidavets, and J Sala
Differences in use of coronary angiography and outcome of myocardial infarction in Toulouse (France) and Gerona (Spain)
Eur. Heart J.,
May 1, 2000;
21(9):
740 - 746.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lupon, V. Valle, J. Marrugat, R. Elosua, L. Seres, M. Pavesi, R. Freixa, G. Sanz, R. Masia, L. Molina, et al.
Six-month outcome in unstable angina patients without previous myocardial infarction according to the use of tertiary cardiologic resources
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 1999;
34(7):
1947 - 1953.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gottlieb, V. Boyko, D. Harpaz, H. Hod, M. Cohen, L. Mandelzweig, Z. Khoury, S. Stern, S. Behar, and for the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group
Long-term (three-year) prognosis of patients treated with reperfusion or conservatively after acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 1, 1999;
34(1):
70 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Marrugat, J. Sala, R. Masia, M. Pavesi, G. Sanz, V. Valle, L. Molina, L. Seres, R. Elosua, and for the RESCATE Investigators
Mortality Differences Between Men and Women Following First Myocardial Infarction
JAMA,
October 28, 1998;
280(16):
1405 - 1409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|