JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:1061-1066
© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magee, A.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magee, A.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, L.

Balloon dilation of severe aortic stenosis in the neonate: comparison of anterograde and retrograde catheter approaches

AG Magee, D Nykanen, BW McCrindle, D Wax, RM Freedom, and LN Benson

Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare anterograde and retrograde balloon dilation of severe aortic valve stenosis in neonates. BACKGROUND: There is a high incidence of iliofemoral artery complications after retrograde balloon dilation of the aortic valve in the neonate. Therefore, a nonarterial technique of catheter access to the aortic valve would be worth exploring. METHODS: Group 1 included 11 consecutive patients (median age 6 days, range 1 to 42; median weight 3.5 kg, range 2.16 to 4.25) undergoing attempted anterograde dilation through a femoral venous approach. Group 2 included 15 patients (median age 3 days, range 1 to 35; median weight 3.4 kg, range 2.5 to 4.4 kg) who underwent attempted retrograde dilation, including 2 in whom attempted anterograde approach had failed. RESULTS: The valve was successfully crossed in 9 of 11 anterograde and 13 of 15 retrograde dilations. In both groups, the peak gradient across the valve decreased significantly (both p = 0.001). On echocardiography, the jet width of the aortic incompetence/ annulus diameter ratio was 0.16 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- SD) after anterograde and 0.51 +/- 0.24 after retrograde dilation (p = 0.03), possibly because of unrecognized valve leaflet perforation. Two patients in group 1 developed persistent, mild mitral insufficiency. Femoral artery thrombosis developed in one patient after anterograde dilation and in eight after retrograde dilation (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that an anterograde approach for balloon angioplasty of severe neonatal aortic valve stenosis is feasible, achieves good hemodynamic relief and lessens morbidity compared with retrograde arterial techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc InterventHome page
D. W. Brown, E. C. Chong, K. Gauvreau, J. F. Keane, J. E. Lock, and A. C. Marshall
Aortic Wall Injury as a Complication of Neonatal Aortic Valvuloplasty: Incidence and Risk Factors
Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Alsoufi, T. Karamlou, B. W. McCrindle, and C. A. Caldarone
Management options in neonates and infants with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1013 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. B. McElhinney, J. E. Lock, J. F. Keane, A. M. Moran, and S. D. Colan
Left Heart Growth, Function, and Reintervention After Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Neonatal Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, February 1, 2005; 111(4): 451 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J V De Giovanni, R A Edgar, and A Cranston
Adenosine induced transient cardiac standstill in catheter interventional procedures for congenital heart disease
Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 330 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.