|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:1057-1060 © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin-Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, USA.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the specificity of commonly used tilt protocols in children. BACKGROUND: Tilt table testing is commonly utilized in the evaluation of children and adolescents with syncope despite a lack of uniformity in tilt protocols and a lack of studies of specificity in normal control subjects. METHODS: Sixty-nine normal control volunteers (12 to 18 years old, 38 male, 31 female) with no previous history of syncope, presyncope or arrhythmia underwent tilting to 80 degrees, 70 degrees or 60 degrees for a maximum of 30 min on a motorized table with a footboard support. Autonomic maneuvers, including deep breathing, carotid massage, Valsalva maneuver and diving reflex, were performed before tilt testing to determine whether the response to these maneuvers could identify subjects prone to fainting during tilt testing. RESULTS: Symptoms of presyncope and frank syncope were elicited in 24 of 69 subjects (13 male, 11 female): 6 (60%) of 10 were tilted at 80 degrees, 9 (29%) of 31 at 70 degrees and 9 (32%) of 28 at 60 degrees. Tilt testing at 80 degrees was terminated after the tenth subject by the institutional review board. The mean time to a positive test response was 10.5 min at 80 degrees, 14.2 min at 70 degrees and 13.2 min at 60 degrees. In the 80 degrees tilt, 4 of 10 subjects had a positive response within 10 minutes, whereas only 3 of 31 and 2 of 28 had a positive response within < 10 min at 70 degrees and 60 degrees tilt angles, respectively. Subjects with and without a positive response to tilt testing were similar with respect to age; gender; PR, QRS and QT intervals; and baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Likewise, responses to other autonomic function tests performed were similar in tilt-positive and tilt-negative patients. The power for detecting a significant difference between patients tilted at 80 degrees versus 60 degrees and 70 degrees was 0.45 and for detecting differences in autonomic tone between tilt-positive (n = 24) and tilt-negative (n = 45) subjects was 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: Children appear to be more susceptible to orthostatic stress than adults. Therefore, tilt protocols commonly used in adults lack specificity in teenage patients. A specificity > 85% may be obtained by performing the tilt test at 60 degrees or 70 degrees for no longer than 10 min.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. W. Parry, J. C. Gray, J. L. Newton, P. Reeve, D. O'shea, and R. A. Kenny 'Front-loaded' head-up tilt table testing: validation of a rapid first line nitrate-provoked tilt protocol for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope Age Ageing, July 1, 2008; 37(4): 411 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Fuca, M. Dinelli, L. Gianfranchi, S. Bressan, C. Lamborghini, and P. Alboni Do subjects with vasovagal syncope have subtle haemodynamic alterations during orthostatic stress? Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 751 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Foglia-Manzillo and F. Giada Tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in children with unexplained syncope: reply Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1075 - 1075. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Foglia-Manzillo, F. Giada, N. Fteita, I. Nessi, M. Santarone, and A. Raviele Tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in children with unexplained syncope Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2605 - 2609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Vlahos, M. Tzoufi, C. S. Katsouras, T. Barka, I. Sionti, L. K. Michalis, A. Siamopoulou, and T. M. Kolettis Provocation of Neurocardiogenic Syncope During Head-up Tilt Testing in Children: Comparison Between Isoproterenol and Nitroglycerin Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(2): e419 - e425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guidelines on Management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope - update 2004: The Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiology Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(6): 467 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Rossano, B. Bloemers, N. Sreeram, S. Balaji, and M. J. Shah Efficacy of Implantable Loop Recorders in Establishing Symptom-Rhythm Correlation in Young Patients With Syncope and Palpitations Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): e228 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.M. Seifer and R.A. Kenny Head-up tilt testing in children Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 1968 - 1971. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiol, M Brignole, P Alboni, D Benditt, L Bergfeldt, J.J Blanc, P.E Bloch Thomsen, J.G van Dijk, A Fitzpatrick, S Hohnloser, et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2001; 22(15): 1256 - 1306. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Baron-Esquivias, A. Pedrote, A. Cayuela, J. I. Valle, J. M. Fernandez, M. J. Estepa, E. Martinez-Morentin, M. Navarro, and J. Burgos Age and gender differences in basal and isoprenaline protocols for head-up tilt table testing Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(2): 136 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. M. Leonelli, K. Wang, J. M. Evans, A. R. Patwardhan, M. G. Ziegler, A. Natale, C. S. Kim, K. Rajikovich, and C. F. Knapp False positive head-up tilt:: Hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 188 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Stewart, M. H. Gewitz, A. Weldon, N. Arlievsky, K. Li, and J. Munoz Orthostatic Intolerance in Adolescent Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
