|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:670-675 © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
OBJECTIVES: We attempted to evaluate nonsurgical methods of treating postcatheterization pseudoaneurysm. BACKGROUND: The value of reapplication of a compression bandage, ultrasound-guided compression repair (UGCR) and awaiting spontaneous thrombosis in the treatment of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms is unsettled. METHODS: We followed a stepwise treatment strategy of primarily conservative management using 1) reapplication of a compression bandage, followed by 2) UGCR, if needed, and 3) observation of the natural course. Surgical repair was reserved for patients with a rapidly expanding or complicated lesion. RESULTS: Reapplication of a compression bandage was performed in 128 patients and was successful in 32%. The success rate correlated inversely with anticoagulant therapy and the size of the aneurysm. In case of failure this pretreatment with a compression bandage significantly enhanced the success rate of subsequent UGCR (p = 0.04). UGCR was performed in 124 cases with a success rate of 84%. In 54 patients with a stable lesion, refraining from any (further) active measures resulted in spontaneous thrombosis of the aneurysm in 50 patients (93%) after 1 to 180 days (median 40 days). The course of the remaining four femoral artery aneurysms was uneventful. Definitive repair by operation or collagen plug implantation was required in only 20 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: The first measure performed in the treatment of pseudoaneurysms should be reapplication of a compression bandage, followed, if necessary, by UGCR. After failure of UGCR, spontaneous healing occurs in the majority of patients. Operation can be reserved for progressive and complicated lesions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Paschalidis, W Theiss, K Kolling, R Busch, and A Schomig Randomised comparison of manual compression repair versus ultrasound guided compression repair of postcatheterisation femoral pseudoaneurysms Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 251 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sueyoshi, I. Sakamoto, K. Nakashima, K. Minami, and K. Hayashi Visceral and Peripheral Arterial Pseudoaneurysms Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 741 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Swelling of volar aspect of the wrist Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2005; 81(958): e11 - e11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Dixon and D S Enion Pseudoaneurysm of the breast: case study and review of literature Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2004; 77(920): 694 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D A Cozzi, F Morini, A Casati, M Pacilli, V Salvini, and F Cozzi Radial artery pseudoaneurysm successfully treated by compression bandage Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 165 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Paulson, D. H. Sheafor, M. A. Kliewer, R. C. Nelson, L. B. Eisenberg, M. W. Sebastian, and M. H. Sketch Jr Treatment of Iatrogenic Femoral Arterial Pseudoaneurysms: Comparison of US-guided Thrombin Injection with Compression Repair Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 403 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |