JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:539-546
© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arenal, A
Right arrow Articles by Delcan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arenal, A
Right arrow Articles by Delcan, J.

Mechanism and location of atrial flutter in transplanted hearts: observations during transient entrainment from distant sites

A Arenal, J Almendral, R Munoz, J Villacastin, JL Merino, J Palomo, JA Garcia Robles, R Peinado, and JL Delcan

Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to elucidate the location and mechanism of typical atrial flutter in the transplanted heart. BACKGROUND: Although the F wave morphology in atrial flutter is similar in nontransplanted and transplanted hearts, the surgical incision needed for the atrial anastomosis may create a distinct electrophysiologic substrate of atrial flutter. METHODS: Entrainment from the lateral wall of the right atrium and interatrial septum was used to determine the location of atrial flutter in five patients with a transplanted heart and six patients with a nontransplanted heart. The difference between the first postpacing interval (FPPI) and the flutter cycle length (FCL) was used as an index of proximity to the circuit. RESULTS: In the transplant group, the FPPI was equal to the FCL at sites located close to the tricuspid annulus (TA); the mean differences (+/-SD) were 1 +/- 5 and -1 +/- 2 ms at the lateral wall and interatrial septum, respectively. However, from sites close to the surgical incision at the lateral wall and at the interatrial septum, these differences were significantly longer (29 +/- 12 and 27 +/- 9 ms, respectively, p < 0.05). In the nontransplant group, the FPPI was similar to the FCL at points in the lateral wall and interatrial septum close to the TA (mean difference 7 +/- 6 and 6 +/- 11 ms, respectively) and at sites close to the crista terminalis (CT) in the lateral wall (mean difference 4 +/- 4 ms). However, in sites separated from the TA at the interatrial septum the difference was markedly longer (35 +/- 11 ms, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter in transplanted hearts may best be explained by macroreentry around the tricuspid ring. In non-transplanted hearts a different structure (perhaps the CT?) may be the basis for atrial flutter at the lateral wall.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Arenal, J. Almendral, J. M. Alday, J. Villacastin, J. M. Ormaetxe, J. L. M. Sande, N. Perez-Castellano, S. Gonzalez, M. Ortiz, and J. L. Delcan
Rate-Dependent Conduction Block of the Crista Terminalis in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter : Influence on Evaluation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Conduction Block
Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2771 - 2778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.