Clinical variables affecting recovery of left atrial mechanical function after cardioversion from atrial fibrillation

Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Institutions, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effect of clinical factors on recovery of atrial function after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Lack of effective mechanical atrial function (EMAF) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation predisposes to thromboembolic complications and delays improvement in functional capacity. METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent cardioversion (group I, electrical cardioversion, n = 40; group II, pharmacologic or spontaneous cardioversion, n = 12) for atrial fibrillation. Serial transmitral inflow Doppler variables were recorded after cardioversion until EMAF (atrial filling velocity > 0.50 m/s) was seen. Clinical variables (age, duration of atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, underlying cardiovascular disease, antiarrhythmic drug therapy and mode of cardioversion) were tested for an association with the outcomes of recovery of atrial function by day 3 and day 7. RESULTS: Effective mechanical atrial function recovered in 68% of patients by day 3 and in 76% by day 7 after cardioversion. The mode of cardioversion was significantly associated with recovery of atrial function by day 3 in bivariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.0, for electrical cardioversion). None of the variables had an association with recovery of atrial function by day 7. Group I patients took a longer time to recover atrial function than group II patients (p = 0.012). In addition, group I patients had a significantly lower peak atrial filling velocity (mean [+/-SD] 0.39 +/- 0.19 m/s vs. 0.56 +/- 0.16 m/s) and a higher early filling to atrial filling velocity ratio (2.5 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5) after cardioversion. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients recover EMAF within 1 week after cardioversion. Patients who undergo electrical cardioversion display a greater degree and a longer duration of mechanical atrial dysfunction than those who convert pharmacologically or spontaneously.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Sirbu, L. Herbots, J. D'hooge, P. Claus, A. Marciniak, T. Langeland, B. Bijnens, F.E. Rademakers, and G.R. Sutherland Feasibility of strain and strain rate imaging for the assessment of regional left atrial deformation: A study in normal subjects Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2006; 7(3): 199 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-C. Wang, J.-L. Lin, J.-J. Hwang, M.-S. Lin, C.-D. Tseng, S. K. S. Huang, and L.-P. Lai Left Atrial Dysfunction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Successful Rhythm Control for > 3 Months Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2551 - 2556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Takagi, A Doi, N Shirai, K Hirata, Y Takemoto, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Hesse, S.U Schuele, M Thamilasaran, J Thomas, and L Rodriguez A rapid method to quantify left atrial contractile function: Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus during atrial systole Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bonanomi, D. Schwartzman, D. Francischelli, K. Hebsgaard, and M. A. Zenati A new device for beating heart bipolar radiofrequency atrial ablation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1859 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Allessie, J. Ausma, and U. Schotten Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 230 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Lehmann, J. Horcher, K. Dennig, A. Plewan, K. Ulm, and E. Alt Atrial Mechanical Performance After Internal and External Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : An Echocardiographic Study Chest, January 1, 2002; 121(1): 13 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Stefanadis, J. Dernellis, and P. Toutouzas A clinical appraisal of left atrial function Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 22 - 36. [PDF]

				C. Stellbrink and P. Hanrath The optimal management of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of flutter: still a 'stunning' problem Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2000; 21(10): 795 - 798. [PDF]

				G. Corrado, M. Santarone, S. Beretta, G. Tadeo, L.M. Tagliagambe, G. Foglia-Manzillo, M. Spata, E. Miglierina, F. Acquati, and M. Santarone Early cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter guided by transoesophageal echocardiography: A single centre 8{middle dot}5-year experience Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 119 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. G. Daoud, P. Marcovitz, B. P. Knight, R. Goyal, K. C. Man, S. A. Strickberger, W. F. Armstrong, and F. Morady Short-Term Effect of Atrial Fibrillation on Atrial Contractile Function in Humans Circulation, June 15, 1999; 99(23): 3024 - 3027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. B. Sparks, S. Jayaprakash, H. G. Mond, J. K. Vohra, L. E. Grigg, and J. M. Kalman Left atrial mechanical function after brief duration atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 342 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. I. Silverman and W. J. Manning Role of Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Elective Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, August 4, 1998; 98(5): 479 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. B. Sparks, S. Jayaprakash, J. K. Vohra, H. G. Mond, A. G. Yapanis, L. E. Grigg, and J. M. Kalman Left atrial "stunning" following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 468 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. J. Castro and C. B. Upshaw, Jr Acute Pulmonary Edema After Overdrive for Atrial Flutter Arch Intern Med, March 23, 1998; 158(6): 679 - 680. [Full Text] [PDF]