JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 30:226-232
© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hallstrom, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hallstrom, A

Predictive value for future arrhythmic events of fractal dimension, a measure of time clustering of ventricular premature complexes, after myocardial infarction. CAST Investigators. Cardia Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

JL Anderson, LA Karagounis, KM Stein, FL Moreno, R Ledingham, and A Hallstrom

University of Utah, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City 84143, USA.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to test fractal dimension (D), a measure of clustering of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), on entry Holter recording as a predictor of future arrhythmic death and other-cause mortality in postinfarction patients in the Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial (CAST). BACKGROUND: Nonlinear dynamic methods of signal processing are being applied in medicine to provide new insights into apparently "chaotic" biologic events, including cardiac arrhythmias. One such application is the derivation of a fractal D to describe the clustering of VPCs in time. METHODS: Baseline Holter recordings were analyzed in blinded manner for 484 patients: 237 died or had a resuscitated cardiac arrest during follow-up, and 247 matched patients had no events. Fractal D, measured in four ways, was assessed as a predictor using Cox regression. RESULTS: One measure of D (high resolution D) was a significant univariate (relative hazard ratio 0.79 per SD change, p = 0.011) and multivariate (hazard ratio 0.75, p = 0.046) predictor of arrhythmic death but not other death (univariate p = 0.95, relative hazard 0.95, p = 0.66). Fractal D was greater (VPCs less clustered) in those patients free of arrhythmic events. On subgroup analysis, the predictive value of D resided in the randomized patient group (i.e., those who showed VPC suppression during initial antiarrhythmic drug titration and were randomized to blinded therapy with active drug or placebo) (multivariate hazard ratio 0.57, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high resolution fractal D was predictive of arrhythmic (but not nonarrhythmic) death in a large postinfarction cohort. Further study of this new signal processing approach to ambulatory electrocardiographic recording will be of interest.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. J. Bailey, M. Hodges, and T. R. Church
Decision to Implant a Cardioverter Defibrillator after Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Ejection Fraction v. Other Risk Factor Markers
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 151 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. J. Eisenberg
Risk stratification for arrhythmic events: are the bangs worth the bucks?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1912 - 1915.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.