Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:1291-1297
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, W

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of intravenous propafenone in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia

EN Shen, RJ Sung, F Morady, AB Schwartz, MM Scheinman, L DiCarlo, and W Shapiro

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of a new antiarrhythmic agent, propafenone, in 28 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone was given at a loading dose of 2 mg/kg in all patients. Subsequently, group A, the first 14 patients, received 1 mg/min and group B, the second 14 patients, received 2 mg/min continuous infusion. Propafenone exerted no effect on sinus nodal recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time, but significantly prolonged atrioventricular (AV) nodal and His-Purkinje conduction time and the QRS duration (respectively, 95 +/- 19, 48 +/- 10 and 120 +/- 23 ms before, and 110 +/- 28, 53 +/- 10 and 135 +/- 27 ms after; p less than 0.001). Propafenone did not change the mean arterial blood pressure but slightly increased right atrial, pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures resulting in mild depression of the cardiac index (2.6 +/- 0.8 liters/min per m2 before and 2.3 +/- 0.7 liters/min per m2 after; p less than 0.001). None of the patients were symptomatic from these changes. In group A, propafenone did not affect the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia except for one patient whose arrhythmia was sustained before and become nonsustained after propafenone. In group B, sustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in three patients and nonsustained in two patients, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in one patient after propafenone. Therefore, an appropriate loading dose of intravenous propafenone such as 2 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/min infusion may be given safely and may suppress ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone may be a useful addition to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M. Valderrabano and B. N. Singh
Review : Electrophysiologic and Antiarrhythmic Effects of Propafenone: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(3): 183 - 198.
[PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
A. Serdar Fak, H. Tezcan, O. Caymaz, S. Tokay, S. Oktay, and A. Oktay
Intravenous Propafenone for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter to Sinus Rhythm: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Study
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1997; 2(4): 251 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement