Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:1282-1290
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Likoff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rocci, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Likoff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rocci, M., Jr

Amrinone in the treatment of chronic cardiac failure

MJ Likoff, KT Weber, V Andrews, JS Janicki, MS Sutton, H Wilson, and ML Rocci Jr

The efficacy and safety of oral amrinone were examined in 17 patients with moderately severe to severe heart failure that was refractory to standard medical therapy and vasodilators. The short-term and 28 week response to open amrinone therapy was assessed first, followed by a placebo-controlled, double-blind withdrawal study of two 13 week stages in nine patients. Rest and exercise ventricular function were determined before and after 32 hours of amrinone; aerobic capacity was serially assessed. After 2 hours, 1.64 mg/kg amrinone produced a 40% (p less than 0.001) increase in cardiac output and a 32% (p less than 0.02) decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure without altering heart rate or blood pressure. The exercise cardiac index-wedge pressure curve obtained 32 hours after the first oral dose was significantly shifted (p less than 0.05) above control values. A sustained improvement in maximal oxygen uptake was noted during long-term open amrinone therapy. Subsequently, seven of the patients randomized to placebo therapy had a significant deterioration of symptoms or exercise tolerance, or both. After 4 weeks of readministration of amrinone, clinical stability was once again established and exercise tolerance was improved by Weeks 8 to 16. Adverse effects of thrombocytopenia (one patient) and hepatic dysfunction (one patient) attributable to amrinone were observed. It is concluded that amrinone is effective in the long-term treatment of chronic cardiac failure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. W. Stevenson
Clinical Use of Inotropic Therapy for Heart Failure: Looking Backward or Forward? Part I: Inotropic Infusions During Hospitalization
Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 367 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Sugawara and M. Endoh
A Novel Cardiotonic Agent SCH00013 Acts as a Ca++ Sensitizer with No Chronotropic Activity in Mammalian Cardiac Muscle
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1998; 287(1): 214 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. R. Marantz, M. H. Alderman, and J. N. Tobin
Diagnostic Heterogeneity in Clinical Trials for Congestive Heart Failure
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1988; 109(1): 55 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
I. F. Goldenberg and J. N. Cohn
New Inotropic Drugs for Heart Failure
JAMA, July 24, 1987; 258(4): 493 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. FRANCIOSA
Intravenous Amrinone: An Advance or a Wrong Step?
Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1985; 102(3): 399 - 400.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement