Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:924-929
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gorlin, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gorlin, R

Relation between exercise-induced changes in ejection fraction and systolic loading conditions at rest in aortic regurgitation

ME Goldman, M Packer, SF Horowitz, J Meller, RE Patterson, M Kukin, LE Teichholz, and R Gorlin

To examine the role of systolic wall stress at rest in determining left ventricular performance during exercise in aortic regurgitation (AR), systolic wall stress (measured by M-mode echocardiography) was related to changes in left ventricular function during maximal exercise (evaluated by radionuclide ventriculography) in 30 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Of these 30 patients, 7 had a normal exercise response, defined as an absolute increase in ejection fraction of 5% or greater (Group I) and 23 had abnormal exercise response, defined as no change (less than 5% change) or a decline (less than or equal to 5%) in ejection fraction (Group II). Patients in Group I had a significantly lower radius/wall thickness ratio (2.5 +/- 0.2 versus 3.1 +/- 0.1, p less than 0.01) and lower peak systolic wall stress (123 +/- 11 versus 211 +/- 12 X 10(3) dynes/cm2, p less than 0.01) than patients in Group II. An increase in ejection fraction during exercise was seen in 6 of the 9 patients with normal systolic wall stress at rest (less than 150 X 10(3) dynes/cm2), but in only 1 of 21 patients with elevated systolic wall stress (p less than 0.001). Peak systolic wall stress at rest varied linearly, and inversely with changes in left ventricular ejection fraction during exercise (r = 0.60, p less than 0.001). Groups I and II did not differ in ejection fraction at rest, clinical symptoms or maximal work load achieved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Bekeredjian and P. A. Grayburn
Valvular Heart Disease: Aortic Regurgitation
Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 125 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. M. Bierig and A. D. Waggoner
Aortic Insufficiency: Etiology, Pathophysiology, Natural History, and the Role of Echocardiography
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 2001; 17(2): 59 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Wahi, B Haluska, A Pasquet, C Case, C M Rimmerman, and T H Marwick
Exercise echocardiography predicts development of left ventricular dysfunction in medically and surgically treated patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation
Heart, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 606 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Lindsay JR, A. Silverman, L. B. Van Voorhees, and N. G. Nolan
Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Function During Exercise in Asymptomatic Patients with Aortic Regurgitation
Angiology, May 1, 1987; 38(5): 386 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. K. Hoshino and W. H. Gaasch
When to Intervene in Chronic Aortic Regurgitation
Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1986; 146(2): 349 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement