Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:1044-1050
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Rourke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, R.
Right arrow Articles by O'Rourke, R.

Beneficial hemodynamic effects of intravenous and oral diltiazem in severe congestive heart failure

RW Walsh, CB Porter, MR Starling, and RA O'Rourke

Concern persists about the potential negative inotropic effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with severely depressed myocardial function. Therefore, intravenous diltiazem (100 to 200 micrograms/kg per min infusion) was administered for 40 minutes followed by oral diltiazem (90 to 120 mg/8 hours) for 24 hours to patients with advanced congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III to IV, mean ejection fraction 26 +/- 4 [SD]). Intravenous diltiazem (eight patients) increased cardiac index 20% (2.05 +/- 0.8 to 2.47 +/- 0.8 liters/min per m2, p less than 0.01), stroke volume index 50% (22 +/- 9 to 33 +/- 12 ml/m2, p less than 0.001) and stroke work index 27% (19 +/- 10 to 24 +/- 10 g-m/m2, p less than 0.05); while reducing heart rate 23% (97 +/- 18 to 75 +/- 11 beats/min, p less than 0.01), mean arterial pressure 18% (95 +/- 13 to 78 +/- 7 mm Hg) and pulmonary wedge pressure 34% (29 +/- 9 to 19 +/- 7 mm Hg), without altering maximal first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax). Oral diltiazem (seven patients) produced equivalent hemodynamic effects. Transient junctional arrhythmias were observed in three of eight patients with intravenous diltiazem and one of seven patients with oral diltiazem. It is concluded that intravenous and short-term oral diltiazem improve left ventricular performance and reduce myocardial oxygen demand by heart rate and afterload reduction without significantly depressing contractile function in severe congestive heart failure. Caution should be exercised to avoid potential adverse, drug-induced electrophysiologic effects in such patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Thompson and J. R. Balser
Perioperative cardiac arrhythmias
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2004; 93(1): 86 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A.U Khand, A.C Rankin, G.C Kaye, and J.G.F Cleland
Systematic review of the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 614 - 632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. Amar
Postoperative Cardiac Arrhythmias: Prevention and Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1997; 1(3): 256 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Amar, N. Roistacher, M. E. Burt, V. W. Rusch, M. S. Bains, D. H. Y. Leung, R. J. Downey, and R. J. Ginsberg
Effects of Diltiazem Versus Digoxin on Dysrhythmias and Cardiac Function After Pneumonectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1374 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement