Difficulty of extraction of chronically implanted tined ventricular endocardial leads

The dislodgment rate of permanent pacing ventricular and atrial endocardial leads has significantly decreased with the incorporation of tines as a fixation device. In contrast, transvenous manual extraction of chronically implanted endocardial leads is, at times, clinically indicated, particularly when pacemaker system infection is present. The success rate of such extraction attempts for ventricular endocardial leads over the past 5 years was reviewed. Extraction was usually successful (six of seven attempts) in patients with silicone rubber nontined (or short-tined) older ventricular endocardial leads (Group A). However, in patients with newer urethane long-tined ventricular endocardial leads (Group B), extraction was unsuccessful in three of four attempts. Because of entrapment of the distal electrode tip in the right ventricular apex, manual traction of these leads resulted in permanent conductor material stretching with resultant urethane insulator material breakage in the region of the joints with proximal and distal electrodes. The one successful extraction in Group B was technically difficult and appeared to create a significant risk of intracardiac lead separation. This experience indicates that with improved pacemaker lead design decreased lead dislodgment has been obtained at the cost of increased difficulty of ventricular endocardial lead extraction. Such difficulty should be anticipated when a clinical decision is made to attempt to extract the new urethane long-tined ventricular leads.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Kwak, S.-J. Kim, J. Y. Song, E. Y. Choi, S. Y. Lee, W. S. Shim, C.-H. Lee, C. Lee, and C. S. Park Permanent Epicardial Pacing in Pediatric Patients: 12-Year Experience at a Single Center Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2012; 93(2): 634 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maytin and L. M. Epstein The challenges of transvenous lead extraction Heart, March 1, 2011; 97(5): 425 - 434. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Stuart Mendenhall and S. Saba Extraction of embolized lead tip from azygous vein using distal embolic protection device Europace, October 1, 2010; 12(10): 1501 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maytin, L. M. Epstein, and C. A. Henrikson Lead Extraction Is Preferred for Lead Revisions and System Upgrades: When Less Is More Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, August 1, 2010; 3(4): 413 - 424. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Murayama, M. Maeda, H. Sakurai, A. Usui, and Y. Ueda Predictors affecting durability of epicardial pacemaker leads in pediatric patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 361 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. R. Thomson, M. E. Blackburn, C. Van Doorn, A. Nicholls, and K. G. Watterson Pacing activity, patient and lead survival over 20 years of permanent epicardial pacing in children Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1366 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F U. Ten Cate, J Breur, N Boramanand, J Crosson, A Friedman, J Brenner, E Meijboom, and N Sreeram Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 392 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Memon, J. Buckley, and A. O'Donnell Percutaneous Extraction of Entrapped Infective Transvenous Pacing Lead Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2002; 10(1): 69 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]