JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:712-723
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bexton, R.
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bexton, R.
Right arrow Articles by Camm, A.

Sinoatrial function after cardiac transplantation

RS Bexton, AW Nathan, KJ Hellestrand, R Cory-Pearce, RA Spurrell, TA English, and AJ Camm

The function of both the denervated donor and innervated recipient sinus nodes of 14 asymptomatic cardiac transplant recipients was assessed. Tests of sinoatrial function were performed in 14 donor and 10 recipient atria. The mean spontaneous cycle length of the recipient atria was significantly longer than that of the donor atria (944 +/- 246 versus 663 +/- 158 ms, p less than 0.01). Donor sinus node recovery time was prolonged in four patients (greater than 2,500 ms in two) and recipient recovery time was prolonged in six patients. In those patients with normal sinus node function tests, the recovery time of the recipient sinus node was longer than that of the donor sinus node (1,170 +/- 207 versus 864 +/- 175 ms, p less than 0.02). The pattern of response of recovery times to increasing pacing rate was predictable and organized in the donor but chaotic in the recipient, and the longest sinus node recovery time occurred at the shortest pacing cycle length used in 12 of the 14 donor atria but in only 1 of the 10 recipient atria (p less than 0.001). Secondary pauses occurred in none of the normal donor atria and in all of the abnormal donor atria (p less than 0.001); however, they occurred in both normal and abnormal recipient atria. The recipient and donor atria were paced alone and synchronously in the same patients. Synchronous pacing had no effect on the recovery times of the donor sinus node but significantly lengthened those of the recipient (sinus node recovery time: 1,266 +/- 218 to 1,547 +/- 332 ms, p less than 0.02; corrected recovery time: 322 +/- 102 to 686 +/- 188 ms, p less than 0.01). In the donor atria, abnormal recovery time was invariably associated with abnormal sinoatrial conduction time. There was a strong correlation between sinoatrial conduction time measured by the methods of Strauss and Narula and their coworkers in the donor atria (r = 0.98, p less than 0.001) but not in the recipient atria (r = 0.72). In the absence of autonomic influences, tests of sinus node function of the donor atria produce predictable and consistent results and, therefore, may be more clinically reliable than in intact human subjects. There is a high incidence of recipient sinus node dysfunction in asymptomatic long-term survivors of cardiac transplantation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Pasic, M. Musci, H. Siniawski, O. Grauhan, B. Edelmann, T. Tedoriya, Y. Weng, and R. Hetzer
THE COX MAZE III PROCEDURE: PARALLEL NORMALIZATION OF SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION, IMPROVEMENT OF ATRIAL FUNCTION, AND RECOVERY OF THE CARDIAC AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1999; 118(2): 287 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N.D. Holt, K. Hetherington, S. Brady, J.H. Dark, and J.M. McComb
Electrophysiological properties of the recipient atrial remnant after human orthotopic cardiac transplantation
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(3): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.