JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1984; 3:262-271
© 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gitler, B
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gitler, B
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, R.

Use of electrocardiographic-thallium exercise testing in clinical practice

B Gitler, M Fishbach, and RM Steingart

Although there is a great deal of data on the accuracy of combined electrocardiographic-thallium exercise testing, little is known about the use of these tests in clinical practice. A quantitative likelihood system was employed to characterize referral patterns for such testing, and the impact of test results on the likelihood of coronary artery disease was examined. Two hundred thirteen subjects consecutively referred for the purpose of establishing or excluding the presence of coronary artery disease were studied. No subject had a history of a prior myocardial infarction. By historical evaluation, 96 had a low likelihood of coronary disease (less than or equal to 0.20), 88 an intermediate likelihood (0.21 to 0.80) and 29 a high likelihood (greater than 0.80). As anticipated from theoretical analyses, testing produced the greatest shifts in disease likelihood in subjects with an intermediate pretest disease likelihood, and confirmed the historical evaluation in patients at the extremes of pretest disease likelihood. Therefore, although electrocardiographic-thallium stress testing is best suited for subjects with intermediate pretest disease likelihood, the majority of referrals had either a high or low likelihood. Clinicians appear to value confirmatory results in patients at the extremes of pretest disease likelihood. Electrocardiographic exercise testing would serve a similar purpose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. G. Stratmann, D. L. Janosik, L. E. Mezei, A. L. Mark, and G. A. Williams
Atrial Pacing with Two-Dimensional Echocardiography for Evaluation of Chest Pain: Comparison with Thallium 201 Scintigraphy
Angiology, November 1, 1991; 42(11): 855 - 865.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. G. Stratmann, A. L. Mark, K. E. Walter, J. W. Fletcher, and G. A. Williams
Atrial Pacing and Thallium 201 Scintigraphy: Combined Use for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Angiology, November 1, 1987; 38(11): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1984 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.