Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound
M Berger,
RL Berdoff,
PE Gallerstein,
and
E Goldberg
Twenty-four patients with suspected aortic stenosis (Group I) were evaluated noninvasively by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound before undergoing cardiac catheterization. Twenty normal subjects served as the control group (Group II). Maximal velocity measurements in the ascending aorta ranged from 3.0 to 5.8 m/s (mean 4.34 +/- 0.65) in Group I versus 1.0 to 1.6 m/s (mean 1.28 +/- 0.16) in Group II (p less than 0.001). Using the Bernoulli equation, the peak pressure gradient across the aortic valve was calculated from the maximal velocity in the Group I patients. The results correlated well with the peak aortic valve gradient obtained at cardiac catheterization (r = 0.79). In 20 of these 24 patients, the peak Doppler gradient was within 25% of the gradient found at cardiac catheterization. In three patients, the Doppler study under-estimated the gradient by slightly more than 25% but still detected the presence of significant aortic stenosis. The Doppler technique failed to detect critical aortic stenosis in only one patient. Significant overestimation of the gradient by Doppler measurement did not occur in any patient. The technique was particularly helpful in older patients in whom other noninvasive tests often yield inconclusive results. An important but infrequent limitation of the technique is underestimation of the gradient that occurs when the angle of incidence between the ultrasound beam and aortic blood flow is too large. The findings indicate that continuous wave Doppler ultrasound provides a reliable estimate of the valvular gradient in most patients with aortic stenosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Arsenault, N. Masani, G. Magni, J. Yao, L. Deras, and N. Pandian
Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 1998;
32(7):
1931 - 1937.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L Rallidis, R P Naoumova, G R Thompson, and P Nihoyannopoulos
Extent and severity of atherosclerotic involvement of the aortic valve and root in familial hypercholesterolaemia
Heart,
December 1, 1998;
80(6):
583 - 590.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Waggoner, B. Barzilai, and J. E. Perez
Two-Dimensional Doppler Echocardiographic Derived Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography,
March 1, 1991;
7(2):
64 - 72.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Otto and A. S. Pearlman
Doppler Echocardiography in Adults With Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis: Diagnostic Utility and Cost-effectiveness
Arch Intern Med,
December 1, 1988;
148(12):
2553 - 2560.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Smith, O. L. Kwan, and A. N. DeMaria
Value and Limitations of Continuous-Wave Doppler Echocardiography in Estimating Severity of Valvular Stenosis
JAMA,
June 13, 1986;
255(22):
3145 - 3151.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|