Timing of first recurrence of syncope predicts syncopal frequency after a positive tilt table test result
P Malik,
ML Koshman,
and
R Sheldon
Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether the time to first recurrence of syncope after a positive isoproteremol-tilt table test result accurately predicts the eventual frequency of syncope. BACKGROUND: Both patient care and future clinical trials involving patients with neuromediated syncope will require a simple measure that reflects the frequency of syncope. The time from tilt table testing to the first recurrence of syncope might be such a measure. METHODS: A cohort of 46 patients with syncope, in a university outpatient clinic, who had at least one syncopal spell after a positive isoproterenol-tilt table test result were followed up for up to 6.5 years (mean [+/-SD] 48 +/- 14 months). The time from tilt table testing to the first recurrence of syncope was correlated. RESULTS: A total of 40 of 46 patients had more than one recurrent spell, with a median of eight recurrent spells. The time to the first syncopal spell predicted the frequency of spells with r = -0.79 (p < 0.001), whereas the time to the second spell predicted the frequency with r = -0.92 (p < 0.001). Patients who fainted within 1 month of tilt testing had a geometric mean frequency of 1.35 spells/month (95% confidence limits 0.49, 3.74) compared with patients who fainted 1 to 24 months after testing (0.12 spells/months; 95% confidence limits 0.07 to 0.18, p < 0.001). Finally, the frequency of syncopal spells bore no relation to the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The time to the first recurrent spell predicts the frequency of syncopal spells after a positive tilt table test result, and the instantaneous risk of syncope is constant.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sheldon, S. Connolly, S. Rose, T. Klingenheben, A. Krahn, C. Morillo, M. Talajic, T. Ku, F. Fouad-Tarazi, D. Ritchie, et al.
Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Metoprolol in the Prevention of Vasovagal Syncope
Circulation,
March 7, 2006;
113(9):
1164 - 1170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Raviele, F. Giada, C. Menozzi, G. Speca, S. Orazi, G. Gasparini, R. Sutton, M. Brignole, and for the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial Investi
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE)
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2004;
25(19):
1741 - 1748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sheldon, S. Rose, S. Connolly, and on behalf of the POST investigators
Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): a randomized clinical trial of beta blockers in the prevention of vasovagal syncope: Rationale and study design
Europace,
January 1, 2003;
5(1):
71 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Sheldon, S. R. Raj, S. Rose, and S. J. Connolly
Beta-blockers in syncope: the jury is still out
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 2001;
38(7):
2135 - 2135.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ammirati, F. Colivicchi, and M. Santini
Permanent Cardiac Pacing Versus Medical Treatment for the Prevention of Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope : A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Circulation,
July 3, 2001;
104(1):
52 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sheldon and S. Rose
Components of clinical trials for vasovagal syncope
Europace,
January 1, 2001;
3(3):
233 - 240.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Connolly, R. Sheldon, R. S. Roberts, M. Gent, and on Behalf of the Vasovagal Pacemaker Study Investi
The North American vasovagal pacemaker study (VPS) : A randomized trial of permanent cardiac pacing for the prevention of vasovagal syncope
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 1, 1999;
33(1):
16 - 20.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|