Acute effects of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with spontaneous and inducible atrial flutter and fibrillation

Cardiac Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Service, Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, New Jersey, USA.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the ability of dual-site right atrial pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter induced by single-site atrial pacing and correlated its efficacy with clinical patient characteristics, atrial activation times and refractory periods. BACKGROUND: Prevention of recurrent AF with long-term dual-site right atrial pacing has been demonstrated in our previous studies. However, the mechanism of antiarrhythmic benefit is unclear. METHODS: Using standard electrophysiologic methods, baseline electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic measurements (mean +/- SD) were obtained. Programmed atrial stimulation was performed for AF or atrial flutter induction. Atrial pacing was performed at two drive cycle lengths (600 and 400 ms) and followed by one to three atrial extrastimuli at one to four pacing sites in the right atrium. In patients with inducible AF or atrial flutter, reinduction was then attempted during a dual-site atrial pacing drive train. This was achieved by simultaneously pacing at the high right atrium and coronary sinus ostium at an identical rate to the baseline stimulation, with the atrial extrastimuli being delivered at the pacing site responsible for the initial AF episode initiation. RESULTS: Twenty patients (10 men, 10 women, mean [+/- SD] age 64 +/- 16 years) with symptomatic AF (n = 10) or atrial flutter (n = 10) were studied. There was a significant abbreviation of the P wave duration to 103 +/- 17 ms with dual-site pacing compared with sinus rhythm (120 +/- 12 ms, p = 0.005) and high right atrial pacing (121 +/- 17 ms, p = 0.005). This was also associated with a characteristic change in P wave configuration with an inferior and leftward axis shift. The effective refractory period at the high right atrium remained unchanged with dual-site atrial pacing compared with single-site high right atrial pacing. Sixteen patients had inducible AF or atrial flutter and could be tested after dual-site atrial pacing. The induced atrial tachyarrhythmia was suppressed in nine patients (56%), who had either induced AF (n = 5) or atrial flutter (n = 4). The difference in the effective refractory period between the high right atrium and the coronary sinus ostium pacing sites was significantly greater (33 +/- 12 ms) in patients with suppression of atrial tachyarrhythmia with dual-site atrial pacing compared with patients without suppression (15 +/- 13 ms, p = 0.001). P wave abbreviation did not correlate with arrhythmia suppression. There was no correlation between suppression of inducible AF or atrial flutter and demographic or clinical patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-site right atrial pacing from the high right atrium and coronary sinus ostium can suppress inducible AF or atrial flutter elicited after single-site high right atrial pacing in selected patients. Acute suppression is more likely in patients with greater dispersion of right atrial refractoriness between these two sites.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Debrunner, B. Naegeli, M. Genoni, M. Turina, and O. Bertel Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac valvular surgery by epicardial, biatrial synchronous pacing Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 16 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Saksena, A. Prakash, P. Ziegler, J. D. Hummel, P. Friedman, V. J. Plumb, D. G. Wyse, E. Johnson, S. Fitts, R. Mehra, et al. Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1140 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Mirza, S. James, and P. Holt Biatrial pacing for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized prospective study into the suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using biatrial pacing J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2002; 40(3): 457 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Cooper, M. S. Katcher, and M. V. Orlov Implantable Devices for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation N. Engl. J. Med., June 27, 2002; 346(26): 2062 - 2068. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Padeletti, P. Pieragnoli, C. Ciapetti, A. Colefa, N. Musilli, M.C. Porciani, A. Michelucci, and G.F. Gensini Prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by permanent septal atrial pacing: long-term follow up Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2001; 3(suppl_P): P2 - P6. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. G. Platonov, S. Yuan, E. Hertervig, O. Kongstad, A. Roijer, A. B. Vygovsky, L. V. Chireikin, and S. B. Olsson Further evidence of localized posterior interatrial conduction delay in lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(2): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Ward, J. E. Willett, C. Bucknall, J. S. Gill, and K. Kamalvand Atrial arrhythmia suppression by atrial overdrive pacing: pacemaker Holter assessment Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(2): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T Levy, S Walker, S Rex, J Rochelle, and V Paul No incremental benefit of multisite atrial pacing compared with right atrial pacing in patients with drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 48 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Saksena Implantable defibrillators in the third millennium: increasingly relegated to a standby role? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 828 - 831. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Daoud, R. Dabir, M. Archambeau, F. Morady, and S. A. Strickberger Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Simultaneous Right and Left Atrial Epicardial Pacing for Prevention of Post-Open Heart Surgery Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, August 15, 2000; 102(7): 761 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-F. Tse, C.-P. Lau, and G.M. Ayers Atrial pacing for suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2000; 21(14): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Becker, R. Klinkott, A. Bauer, J. C. Senges, K. D. Schreiner, F. Voss, W. Kuebler, and W. Schoels Multisite pacing for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias: potential mechanisms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1939 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Levy, G.H. Jenkins, S. Walker, L. Grieve, C. Webb, M.G. Buckley, D.R.J. Singer, and V. Paul Does the mechanism of action of biatrial pacing for atrial fibrillation involve changes in cardiac haemodynamics?: Assessment by Doppler echocardiography and natriuretic peptide measurements Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. P. Gerstenfeld, M. R. S. Hill, S. N. French, R. Mehra, K. Rofino, T. J. Vander Salm, and R. S. Mittleman Evaluation of right atrial and biatrial temporary pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1981 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Delfaut, S. Saksena, A. Prakash, and R. B. Krol Long-term outcome of patients with drug-refractory atrial flutter and fibrillation after single- and dual-site right atrial pacing for arrhythmia prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1900 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Papageorgiou, F. Anselme, C. J. H. J. Kirchhof, K. Monahan, C. A. F. Rasmussen, L. M. Epstein, and M. E. Josephson Coronary Sinus Pacing Prevents Induction of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1893 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text]