Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 29:688-692
© 1997 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murakawa, Y
Right arrow Articles by Omata, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murakawa, Y
Right arrow Articles by Omata, M

Can a class III antiarrhythmic drug improve electrical defibrillation efficacy during ventricular fibrillation?

Y Murakawa, T Yamashita, Y Kanese, and M Omata

Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: We tested whether a new class III drug (MS-551) administered during ventricular fibrillation (VF) could decrease the defibrillation threshold (DFT) in anesthetized canine hearts. BACKGROUND: Pretreatment with class III antiarrhythmic agents is known to enhance electrical defibrillation efficacy. METHODS: In a preliminary study (n = 10), we ascertained the validity of DFT determination by a sequence of incremental defibrillation shocks in a single fibrillation/defibrillation episode. We then compared the DFTs after 130 s of VF with and without administration of MS-551 (2 mg/kg body weight) at 10 s after the onset of VF in 12 open chest dogs and 8 closed chest dogs. RESULTS: MS-551 decreased the DFT in both experimental models (open chest [mean +/- SD]: from 416 +/- 106 to 318 +/- 92 V, p < 0.05; closed chest: from 714 +/- 75 to 615 +/- 112 V, p < 0.05). The change (delta) in DFT in each heart was inversely correlated with the drug-induced prolongation of VF cycle length before the defibrillation attempt (delta DFT vs. delta VF cycle length 10 s before the first discharge: r = -0.58 and -0.81, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MS-551 given after the induction of VF improved defibrillation efficacy. Class III antiarrhythmic agents deserve consideration when VF is resistant to electrical defibrillation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Yamazaki, H. Honjo, H. Nakagawa, Y. S. Ishiguro, Y. Okuno, M. Amino, I. Sakuma, K. Kamiya, and I. Kodama
Mechanisms of destabilization and early termination of spiral wave reentry in the ventricle by a class III antiarrhythmic agent, nifekalant
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H539 - H548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Sen, G. Cui, Y. Sakaguchi, and B. N. Singh
Electrophysiological Effects of MS-551, a New Class III Agent: Comparison with dl-Sotalol in Dogs
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1998; 285(2): 687 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement