Changes in intracardiac atrial cardioversion threshold at rest and during exercise

Department of Heart Disease, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) the change in the intracardiac atrial defibrillation threshold (ADT) at rest and during exercise, to quantify the effective risk of low energy endocavitary cardioversion during the effort and to compare the ADT of chronic and reinduced AF. BACKGROUND: Low energy endocavitary cardioversion is a new alternative to transthoracic shock in patients with chronic AF. Nevertheless, patient discomfort and possible induction of ventricular arrhythmias should be further evaluated. METHODS: Sixteen patients with chronic AF were included in the study. Two 6F custom-made catheters (Electro-Catheter, Inc.) were used for shock delivery and one tetrapolar lead for ventricular synchronization. Without sedation and in a random order, patients underwent two sequences of shocks to determine the ADT at rest and during exercise. Exercise was performed isometrically by the superior limbs. Atrial fibrillation was reinduced by atrial pacing. After each shock, the patients were requested to grade their discomfort with a score from 1 to 5. The power of the study was > 90% in detecting a 25% difference in the ADT between groups. RESULTS: Patients were classified into two groups: Nine patients (group A) underwent the first cardioversion during exercise; seven patients (group B) underwent the first cardioversion at rest. In total, the mean (+/-SD) ADT was 6.70 +/- 1.54 J during exercise and 7.02 +/- 1.82 J at rest (p = 0.59). A significantly lower ADT was observed in the second shock sequence than the first one (6.32 +/- 2.09 J vs. 7.40 +/- 0.87 J, p < 0.05). The discomfort score was 3.25 +/- 0.86 at rest and 2.94 +/- 0.77 during exercise (p = 0.09). No complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Low energy endocavitary cardioversion is a safe and effective procedure in patients with chronic AF. Discomfort is not generally severe enough to result in procedure termination. The ADT is not influenced by exercise and is higher in chronic than in reinduced AF.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Komatsu, K. Uno, K. Otomo, Y. Nagata, H. Taniguchi, K. Ogura, Y. Egami, K. Takayama, K. Kakita, and Y. Iesaka Atrial defibrillation threshold as a novel predictor of clinical outcome of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation Europace, February 1, 2011; 13(2): 213 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Q. Villani, M. F. Piepoli, and A. Capucci Reproducibility of internal atrial defibrillation threshold in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ammer, G.u. Lehmann, A. Plewan, K. Puetter, and E. Alt Marked reduction in atrial defibrillation thresholds with repeated internal cardioversion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1569 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Boriani, M. Biffi, A. Capucci, G. Bronzetti, G. M. Ayers, R. Zannoli, A. Branzi, and B. Magnani Favorable effects of flecainide in transvenous internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]