Percutaneous treatment of protected and unprotected left main coronary stenoses with new devices: immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow-up
JJ Lopez,
KK Ho,
RC Stoler,
RP Caputo,
JP Carrozza,
RE Kuntz,
DS Baim,
and
DJ Cohen
Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of left main coronary stenoses in the new device era. BACKGROUND: Historically, balloon angioplasty of left main coronary stenoses has been associated with high procedural morbidity and poor long-term results. It is not clear whether new devices are more effective in this anatomic setting. METHODS: Between July 1993 and July 1995, we performed initial left main coronary interventions on 46 patients (mean age 67 +/- 12 years, 26% women). Quantitative angiography was available for 42 of 46 interventions, and clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after initial revascularization. RESULTS: Most interventions (42 of 46) were performed in patients with "protected" coronary stenoses to the left coronary system owing to the presence of one or more patent left main coronary grafts. Seventy-seven percent of screened patients were deemed unsuitable for repeat coronary artery bypass surgery. Procedures performed included stenting in 73% of patients (alone in 30% and after rotational atherectomy in 43%), rotational atherectomy in 58% (alone in 15% and before stenting in 43%), directional atherectomy in 4% and angioplasty alone in 7%. Initial procedural success was achieved in all interventions, with no deaths, myocardial infarctions (creatine kinase, MB fraction > 50 IU/liter) or emergent bypass surgery. Follow-up data to date (median duration 9 months, range 6 to 19) demonstrate a 98% overall survival rate and a 6-month event-free survival rate of 78% (six target vessel revascularizations [TVRs], four non-TVRs). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of protected left main coronary artery stenoses can be accomplished safely and effectively with new device technology. Intermediate-term follow-up demonstrates an acceptably low rate of death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization at 6 months and 1 year.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Teirstein
Percutaneous Revascularization Is the Preferred Strategy for Patients With Significant Left Main Coronary Stenosis
Circulation,
February 24, 2009;
119(7):
1021 - 1033.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Brinker
The Left Main Facts: Faced, Spun, But Alas Too Few
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 4, 2008;
51(9):
893 - 898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Teirstein
Unprotected left main intervention patient selection, operator technique, and clinical outcomes.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
February 1, 2008;
1(1):
5 - 13.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Baim, L. Mauri, and D. C. Cutlip
Drug-Eluting Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Are We Ready to Replace Bypass Surgery?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 21, 2006;
47(4):
878 - 881.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al.
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J.,
April 2, 2005;
26(8):
804 - 847.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Kelley, B. D. Klugherz, S. M. Hashemi, N. F. Meneveau, J. M. Johnston, W. H. Matthai Jr, V. S. Banka, H. C. Herrmann, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, S. E. Kimmel, et al.
One-year clinical outcomes of protected and unprotected left main coronary artery stenting
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2003;
24(17):
1554 - 1559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Park, M.-K. Hong, C. W. Lee, J.-J. Kim, J.-K. Song, D.-H. Kang, S.-W. Park, and G. S. Mintz
Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: Effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 1, 2001;
38(4):
1054 - 1060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E Regar, G Sianos, and P W Serruys
Stent development and local drug delivery
Br. Med. Bull.,
October 1, 2001;
59(1):
227 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, M.-C. Chen, H.-W. Chang, K. Y.-K. Hsieh, C.-L. Hang, and M. Fu
Effect of Primary Angioplasty on Total or Subtotal Left Main Occlusion : Analysis of Incidence, Clinical Features, Outcomes, and Prognostic Determinants
Chest,
October 1, 2001;
120(4):
1212 - 1217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2001;
37(8):
2239 - 2239.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Black Jr, R. Cortina, I. Bossi, R.e. Choussat, J. Fajadet, and J. Marco
Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: Correlates of midterm survival and impact of patient selection
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 1, 2001;
37(3):
832 - 838.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-K. Yip, C.-J. Wu, K.-H. Yeh, C.-L. Hang, C.-Y. Fang, K. Y.-K. Hsieh, and M. Fu
Unusual Complication of Retrograde Dissection to the Coronary Sinus of Valsalva During Percutaneous Revascularization : A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
Chest,
February 1, 2001;
119(2):
493 - 501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Al Suwaidi, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr
Coronary Artery Stents
JAMA,
October 11, 2000;
284(14):
1828 - 1836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Baim
Is it time to offer elective percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main coronary artery?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 1, 2000;
35(6):
1551 - 1553.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bonnet, P. Bonhoeffer, D. Sidi, J. Kachaner, P. Acar, E. Villain, and P. R. Vouhe
SURGICAL ANGIOPLASTY OF THE MAIN CORONARY ARTERIES IN CHILDREN
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
February 1, 1999;
117(2):
352 - 357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Ellis, H. Tamai, M. Nobuyoshi, K. Kosuga, A. Colombo, D. R. Holmes, C. Macaya, C. L. Grines, P. L. Whitlow, H. J. White, et al.
Contemporary Percutaneous Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Stenoses : Initial Results From a Multicenter Registry Analysis 1994 1996
Circulation,
December 2, 1997;
96(11):
3867 - 3872.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Mack, D. L. Brown, and A. Sankaran
Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass for Protected Left Main Coronary Stenosis Angioplasty
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 1997;
64(2):
545 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|