Coronary angioplasty for elderly patients with "high risk" unstable angina: short-term outcomes and long-term survival

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Colorado 80220, USA.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the short- and long-term mortality rates in patients > or = 70 years old with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with predicted coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) short-term and U.S. census long-term mortality rates. BACKGROUND: Coronary angioplasty is an alternative revascularization strategy for patients with medically refractory rest angina and a high risk of adverse outcomes with CABG. Patients > or = 70 years old are a specific high risk subset. METHODS: A total of 131 consecutive patients aged > or = 70 years with unstable angina underwent PTCA; 82 (62%) of 131 had been refused CABG. Mortality over time was obtained from the Veterans Affairs Beneficiary Index Records Locator Subsystem. Predicted 30-day CABG-associated mortality was obtained from the Veterans Affairs Cardiac Risk Assessment Model. Mortality over time was expressed with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The observed 30-day angioplasty survival rate was 87% compared with the predicted surgical 30-day survival rate of 85.5%. In those patients who survived 6 months after angioplasty (84%), their subsequent 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival rates were comparable to age-matched subjects in the U.S. census. Mortality in certain subsets known to be at very high risk for CABG-for example, patients who had a previous CABG-was not high in this cohort of elderly subjects. The extremely high risk subsets identified in this PTCA cohort (shock, heart failure, pressors required, balloon pump required) were relatively infrequent subsets. CONCLUSIONS: For selected elderly patients with unstable angina deemed to be at "high risk" or even "prohibitive risk" for CABG, PTCA is an alternative revascularization strategy. The long-term mortality of successfully treated elderly patients is comparable to age-matched subjects. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of CABG versus PTCA, which includes patients > or = 70 years old, is being conducted (Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 385: AWESOME).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Agarwal, C. Schechter, and A. Zaman Assessment of functional status and quality of life after percutaneous coronary revascularisation in octogenarians Age Ageing, November 1, 2009; 38(6): 748 - 751. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Liistro, P Angioli, G Falsini, K Ducci, S Baldassarre, A Burali, and L Bolognese Early invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: comparison with younger patients regarding 30 day and long term outcome Heart, October 1, 2005; 91(10): 1284 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Braunwald, E. M. Antman, J. W. Beasley, R. M. Califf, M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Hochman, R. H. Jones, D. Kereiakes, J. Kupersmith, T. N. Levin, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 970 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kahler, M. Lutke, J. Weckmuller, R. Koster, T. Meinertz, and C.W. Hamm Coronary angioplasty in octogenarians. Quality of life and costs Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1791 - 1798. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Halon, M. Y. Flugelman, A. Merdler, H. Rennert, J. Shahla, and B. S. Lewis Long-term (10-year) outcome in patients with unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1603 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. De Gregorio, Y. Kobayashi, R. Albiero, B. Reimers, C. Di Mario, L. Finci, and A. Colombo Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 577 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]