Long-term follow-up after radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node in patients with atrial fibrillation

Department of the Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the long-term follow-up results in 62 patients with atrial fibrillation and an uncontrolled ventricular rate, who underwent radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular (AV) node. BACKGROUND: Previous studies in small numbers of patients have suggested that radiofrequency modification may be effective in controlling the ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation, but long-term follow-up data have been lacking. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 62 consecutive patients (mean age +/- SD 65 +/- 14 years; 43 with structural heart disease) who underwent an attempt at radiofrequency modification of the AV node because of symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation with an uncontrolled ventricular rate. The atrial fibrillation was chronic in 46 patients and paroxysmal in 16. Radiofrequency energy was applied to the posteroseptal or mid-septal right atrium to lower the ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation to 120 to 130 beats/min during an infusion of 4 micrograms/min of isoproterenol. RESULTS: Short-term control of the ventricular rate was successfully achieved without the induction of pathologic AV block in 50 (81%) of 62 patients. Inadvertent high degree AV block occurred in 10 (16%) of 62 patients, with the AV block occurring at the time of the procedure in 6 patients and 36 to 72 h after the procedure in 4. During 19 +/- 8 months of follow-up (range 4 to 33), 5 (10%) of 50 patients had a symptomatic recurrence of an uncontrolled rate during atrial fibrillation. Overall, adequate rate control at rest and during exertion, without pathologic AV block, was achieved long term in 45 (73%) of 62 patients. Among 37 patients with a successful outcome, left ventricular ejection fraction increased from (mean +/- SD) 0.44 +/- 0.14 to 0.51 +/- 0.10 one year later (p < 0.001). Complications other than AV block included polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 10 to 24 h after the procedure in two patients who had a predisposing factor for ventricular tachycardia and sudden death 1 to 5 months after the procedure in two patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, one of whom had a pacemaker for AV block. CONCLUSIONS: In approximately 70% of properly selected patients with atrial fibrillation and an uncontrolled ventricular rate, radiofrequency modification of the AV node results in excellent long-term control of the ventricular rate at rest and during exertion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. R. Betts Atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker implant for atrial fibrillation: still a valid treatment in appropriately selected patients Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 425 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-q. Zhong, W. Zhang, H. Gao, Y. Li, M. Zhong, D. Li, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhang Changes in connexin 43, metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase during tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in dogs Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Bunch, S. Mahapatra, G. K. Bruce, S. B. Johnson, D. V. Miller, B. D. Horne, X.-L. Wang, H.-C. Lee, N. M. Caplice, and D. L. Packer Impact of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 on Atrioventricular Node Conduction Modification by Injected Autologous Fibroblasts in the Canine Heart Circulation, May 30, 2006; 113(21): 2485 - 2494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Chen, N. F. Marrouche, Y. Khaykin, A. M. Gillinov, O. Wazni, D. O. Martin, A. Rossillo, A. Verma, J. Cummings, D. Erciyes, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired systolic function J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1004 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Khairy and S. Nattel New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 29, 2002; 167(9): 1012 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, T. Tabata, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, J. Watanabe, N. L. Greenberg, R. A. Grimm, and T. N. Mazgalev Selective AV nodal vagal stimulation improves hemodynamics during acute atrial fibrillation in dogs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): H1490 - H1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Deshmukh, D. A. Casavant, M. Romanyshyn, and K. Anderson Permanent, Direct His-Bundle Pacing : A Novel Approach to Cardiac Pacing in Patients With Normal His-Purkinje Activation Circulation, February 29, 2000; 101(8): 869 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C Rankin and A. J Workman Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Garrigue, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Role of the differential bombardment of atrial inputs to the atrioventricular node as a factor influencing ventricular rate during high atrial rate Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 344 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. N. Mazgalev, S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, Y. Yamanouchi, and P. J. Tchou Autonomic Modification of the Atrioventricular Node During Atrial Fibrillation : Role in the Slowing of Ventricular Rate Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2806 - 2814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, G. Fahy, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Atrial Input Modification Circulation, May 4, 1999; 99(17): 2323 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Bigger Jr Epidemiological and Mechanistic Studies of Atrial Fibrillation as a Basis for Treatment Strategies Circulation, September 8, 1998; 98(10): 943 - 945. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, S. Zhuang, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, and T. N. Mazgalev Optimal ventricular rate slowing during atrial fibrillation by feedback AV nodal-selective vagal stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1102 - H1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]