Complications associated with pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of subcutaneous and submuscular approaches. Worldwide Jewel Investigators
MR Gold,
RW Peters,
JW Johnson,
and
Shorofsky SR
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. MGold@Heart.ab.umd.edu
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare complications in a large cohort of patients undergoing pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with a subcutaneous or submuscular approach. BACKGROUND: Pectoral placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) pulse generators is now routine because of downsizing of these devices. subcutaneous implantation has been advocated by some because it is a simple surgical procedure comparable to pacemaker insertion. Others have favored submuscular insertion to avoid wound complications. These surgical approaches have not been compared previously. METHODS: The subjects for this study were 1,000 consecutive patients receiving a Medtronic Jewel ICD at 93 centers worldwide. Cumulative follow-up for all patients was 633.7 patient-years, with 64.9% of patients followed up for > or = 6 months. The complications evaluated were erosion, pocket hematoma, seroma, wound infection, dehiscence, device migration, lead fracture and dislodgment. RESULTS: Subcutaneous implantation was performed in 604 patients and submuscular implantation in the remaining 396. The median procedural times were shorter for subcutaneous implantation (p = 0.014). In addition, the cumulative percentage of patients free from erosion was greater for subcutaneous implantations (p = 0.03, 100% vs. 99.1% at 6 months). However, lead dislodgment was more common with subcutaneous implantations (p = 0.019, 2.3% vs. 0.5% at 6 months) and occurred primarily during the first month postoperatively. Overall, there were no significant differences in cumulative freedom from complications between groups (4.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.1836). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous pectoral implantation of this ICD can be performed safely and has a low complication rate. This approach requires a simple surgical procedure and, compared with the submuscular approach, is associated with shorter procedure times and comparable overall complication rates. However, early follow-up is important in view of the increased lead dislodgment rate.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Haines, Y. Wang, and J. Curtis
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry Risk Score Models for Acute Procedural Complications or Death After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation
Circulation,
May 17, 2011;
123(19):
2069 - 2076.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Krahn, D. S. Lee, D. Birnie, J. S. Healey, E. Crystal, P. Dorian, C. S. Simpson, Y. Khaykin, D. Cameron, A. Janmohamed, et al.
Predictors of Short-Term Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: Results From the Ontario ICD Database
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
April 1, 2011;
4(2):
136 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Obeyesekere, S. Kamberi, N. Youngs, and J. Alison
Long-term performance of submammary defibrillator system
Europace,
September 1, 2010;
12(9):
1239 - 1244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. B. Kutinsky, R. Jarandilla, M. Jewett, and D. E. Haines
Risk of Hematoma Complications After Device Implant in the Clopidogrel Era
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
August 1, 2010;
3(4):
312 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Amin, D. B. Matchar, M. A. Wood, and K. A. Ellenbogen
Management of recalled pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a decision analysis model.
JAMA,
July 26, 2006;
296(4):
412 - 420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. K. H. Wiegand, D. LeJeune, F. Boguschewski, H. Bonnemeier, F. Eberhardt, H. Schunkert, and F. Bode
Pocket Hematoma After Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Surgery: Influence of Patient Morbidity, Operation Strategy, and Perioperative Antiplatelet/Anticoagulation Therapy
Chest,
October 1, 2004;
126(4):
1177 - 1186.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Sims, K. L. Schoff, J. M. Loeb, and N. A. Wiegert
Regional gap junction inhibition increases defibrillation thresholds
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 5, 2003;
285(1):
H10 - H16.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, V. Nikolski, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Mechanisms of shock-induced arrhythmogenesis during acute global ischemia
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 1, 2002;
282(6):
H2141 - H2151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Glatter and L. B. Liem
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Current Progress and Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
September 1, 2000;
4(3):
162 - 179.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K J Lipscomb, N J Linker, and A P Fitzpatrick
Subpectoral implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator under local anaesthesia
Heart,
March 1, 1998;
79(3):
253 - 255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Cheng, K. A. Mowrey, V. Nikolski, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Mechanisms of shock-induced arrhythmogenesis during acute global ischemia
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 1, 2002;
282(6):
H2141 - H2151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|