Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices

A. De Gasperis Cardiology Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the mitral valve areas of patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenoses as determined by means of four echocardiographic and Doppler methods with those obtained by direct anatomic measurements. BACKGROUND: There has been no systemic comparison between Doppler-determined valve areas and the true anatomic orifice in a single cohort. METHODS: In 30 patients with mitral stenosis, the mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area were compared with the values directly measured on the corresponding excised specimen by means of a custom-built sizer. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient was r = 0.95 (SE 0.06, p < 0.0001) for two-dimensional planimetry; r = 0.80 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for pressure half-time; r = 0.87 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for flow convergence region; and r = 0.54 (SD 0.1, p < 0.002) for flow area. Two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area overestimated the actual anatomic orifice by > 0.3 cm2 in 2, 1, 6 and 0 patients, respectively, and underestimated it by > 0.3 cm2 in 0, 4, 1 and 8 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional planimetry, pressure half-time and proximal flow convergence region reliably correlated with size of the anatomic orifice. The flow area method provided a less reliable correlation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Flachskampf and L. Klinghammer Determination of stenotic mitral valve area: new, old, and gold standards Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 321 - 321. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. P. de Isla Reply to the letter to the editor by F. A. Flachskampf et al. Determination of stenotic mitral valve area: new, old, and gold standards Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 321 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Messika-Zeitoun, A. Cachier, E. Brochet, B. Cormier, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian Evaluation of mitral valve area by the proximal isovelocity surface area method in mitral stenosis: Could it be simplified? Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2007; 8(2): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Authors/Task Force Members, A. Vahanian, H. Baumgartner, J. Bax, E. Butchart, R. Dion, G. Filippatos, F. Flachskampf, R. Hall, B. Iung, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., January 26, 2007; (2007) ehl428v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Bonow, M. D. Cheitlin, M. H. Crawford, and P. S. Douglas Task Force 3: Valvular heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1334 - 1340. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zamorano, L. Perez de Isla, L. Sugeng, P. Cordeiro, J. L. Rodrigo, C. Almeria, L. Weinert, T. Feldman, C. Macaya, R. M. Lang, et al. Non-invasive assessment of mitral valve area during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: role of real-time 3D echocardiography Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2086 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Mohan, A. R. Patel, R. Passey, D. Gupta, M. Kumar, R. Arora, and N. G. Pandian Is the mitral valve area flow-dependent in mitral stenosis?: A dobutamine stress echocardiographic study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1809 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Binder, R. Rosenhek, G. Porenta, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1355 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]