Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:1190-1197
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faletra, F
Right arrow Articles by Pezzano, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faletra, F
Right arrow Articles by Pezzano, A, Sr

Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices

F Faletra, A Pezzano Jr, R Fusco, A Mantero, R Corno, W Crivellaro, F De Chiara, E Vitali, V Gordini, P Magnani, and A Pezzano Sr

A. De Gasperis Cardiology Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the mitral valve areas of patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenoses as determined by means of four echocardiographic and Doppler methods with those obtained by direct anatomic measurements. BACKGROUND: There has been no systemic comparison between Doppler-determined valve areas and the true anatomic orifice in a single cohort. METHODS: In 30 patients with mitral stenosis, the mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area were compared with the values directly measured on the corresponding excised specimen by means of a custom-built sizer. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient was r = 0.95 (SE 0.06, p < 0.0001) for two-dimensional planimetry; r = 0.80 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for pressure half-time; r = 0.87 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for flow convergence region; and r = 0.54 (SD 0.1, p < 0.002) for flow area. Two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area overestimated the actual anatomic orifice by > 0.3 cm2 in 2, 1, 6 and 0 patients, respectively, and underestimated it by > 0.3 cm2 in 0, 4, 1 and 8 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional planimetry, pressure half-time and proximal flow convergence region reliably correlated with size of the anatomic orifice. The flow area method provided a less reliable correlation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
A. Grimaldi, I. Olivotto, F. Figini, F. Pappalardo, E. Capritti, E. Ammirati, F. Maisano, S. Benussi, A. Fumero, A. Castiglioni, et al.
Dynamic assessment of 'valvular reserve capacity' in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, December 5, 2011; (2011) jer269v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Lembcke, T. Durmus, Y. Westermann, A. Geigenmueller, B. Claus, C. Butler, and H. Thiele
Assessment of Mitral Valve Stenosis by Helical MDCT: Comparison With Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheterization
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2011; 197(3): 614 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
A. E. Weyman
Assessment of Mitral Stenosis: Role of Real-Time 3D TEE
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., June 1, 2011; 4(6): 589 - 591.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
A. M. Salem Omar, H. Tanaka, T. K. AbdelDayem, A. S. Sadek, H. Raslaan, A. Al-Sherbiny, K. Yamawaki, K. Ryo, Y. Fukuda, K. Norisada, et al.
Comparison of mitral valve area by pressure half-time and proximal isovelocity surface area method in patients with mitral stenosis: effect of net atrioventricular compliance
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, April 1, 2011; 12(4): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
P. Caso, R. Ancona, G. Di Salvo, S. Comenale Pinto, M. Macrino, V. Di Palma, A. D'Andrea, A.R. Martiniello, S. Severino, and R. Calabro
Atrial reservoir function by strain rate imaging in asymptomatic mitral stenosis: prognostic value at 3 year follow-up
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, August 1, 2009; 10(6): 753 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
H. Baumgartner, J. Hung, J. Bermejo, J. B. Chambers, A. Evangelista, B. P. Griffin, B. Iung, C. M. Otto, P. A. Pellikka, and M. Quinones
Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 1 - 25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
F. A. Flachskampf and L. Klinghammer
Determination of stenotic mitral valve area: new, old, and gold standards
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 321 - 321.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
L. P. de Isla
Reply to the letter to the editor by F. A. Flachskampf et al. Determination of stenotic mitral valve area: new, old, and gold standards
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 321 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
D. Messika-Zeitoun, A. Cachier, E. Brochet, B. Cormier, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian
Evaluation of mitral valve area by the proximal isovelocity surface area method in mitral stenosis: Could it be simplified?
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2007; 8(2): 116 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, A. Vahanian, H. Baumgartner, J. Bax, E. Butchart, R. Dion, G. Filippatos, F. Flachskampf, R. Hall, B. Iung, et al.
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., January 26, 2007; (2007) ehl428v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, M. D. Cheitlin, M. H. Crawford, and P. S. Douglas
Task Force 3: Valvular heart disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1334 - 1340.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. Zamorano, L. Perez de Isla, L. Sugeng, P. Cordeiro, J. L. Rodrigo, C. Almeria, L. Weinert, T. Feldman, C. Macaya, R. M. Lang, et al.
Non-invasive assessment of mitral valve area during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: role of real-time 3D echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2086 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. C. Mohan, A. R. Patel, R. Passey, D. Gupta, M. Kumar, R. Arora, and N. G. Pandian
Is the mitral valve area flow-dependent in mitral stenosis?: A dobutamine stress echocardiographic study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1809 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. M. Binder, R. Rosenhek, G. Porenta, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1355 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement