Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease

Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the spectrum of coronary vasodilatory reserve values in patients with angiographically normal arteries who had atypical chest pain syndromes or remote coronary artery disease or were heart transplant recipients. BACKGROUND: The measurement of post-stenotic coronary vasodilatory reserve, now possible in a large number of patients in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, is increasingly used for decision making. Controversy exists regarding the range of normal values obtained in angiographically normal coronary arteries in patients with different clinical presentations. METHODS: Quantitative coronary arteriography was performed in 214 patients classified into three groups: 85 patients with chest pain syndromes and angiographically normal arteries (group 1); 21 patients with one normal vessel and at least one vessel with > 50% diameter lumen narrowing (group 2); and 108 heart transplant recipients (group 3). Coronary vasodilatory reserve (the ratio of maximal to basal average coronary flow velocity) was measured in 416 arteries using a 0.018-in. (0.04 cm) Doppler-tipped angioplasty guide wire. Intracoronary adenosine (8 to 18 micrograms) was used to produce maximal hyperemia. RESULTS: Coronary vasodilatory reserve was higher in angiographically normal arteries in patients with chest pain syndromes (group 1:2.80 +/- 0.6 [group mean +/- SD]) than in normal vessels in patients with remote coronary artery disease (group 2: 2.5 +/- 0.95, p = 0.04); both values were significantly higher than those in the post-stenotic segment of the diseased artery (1.8 +/- 0.6, p < 0.007). Coronary vasodilatory reserve in transplant recipients (group 3) was higher than that in the other groups (3.1 +/- 0.9, p < 0.05 vs. groups 1 and 2) as a group and for individual arteries. When stratified by vessel, coronary vasodilatory reserve was similar among the left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary arteries. There were no differences between coronary vasodilatory reserve values on the basis of gender for patients with coronary artery disease and transplant recipients. In group 1 (chest pain), there was a trend toward higher coronary vasodilatory reserve in men than in women (2.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.7 +/- 0.6, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: These findings identify a normal reference range for studies assessing the coronary circulation and post-stenotic coronary vasodilatory reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease encountered in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Vaccarino, L. Badimon, R. Corti, C. de Wit, M. Dorobantu, A. Hall, A. Koller, M. Marzilli, A. Pries, R. Bugiardini, et al. Ischaemic heart disease in women: are there sex differences in pathophysiology and risk factors?: Position Paper from the Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2011; 90(1): 9 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Vaccarino Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Many Questions, Few Facts Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, March 1, 2010; 3(2): 111 - 115. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Xiao, S. Yang, and L. Zhang Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Causes Sex-Dependent Impairment in the Myogenic Reactivity of Coronary Arteries in Adult Offspring Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Bierig, P. Mikolajczak, S. C. Herrmann, N. Elmore, M. Kern, and A. J. Labovitz Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography derived myocardial perfusion reserve with invasive determination of coronary flow reserve Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Han, J. H. Bae, D. R. Holmes Jr, R. J. Lennon, E. Eeckhout, G. W. Barsness, C. S. Rihal, and A. Lerman Sex differences in atheroma burden and endothelial function in patients with early coronary atherosclerosis Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2008; 29(11): 1359 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J.-W. Bech, B. De Bruyne, E. Eeckhout, W. F. Fearon, S. T. Higano, M. J. Lim, M. Meuwissen, J. J. Piek, et al. Physiological Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1321 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. Gagliardi, R. Adorisio, F. Crea, P. Versacci, R. Di Donato, and S. P. Sanders Abnormal Vasomotor Function of the Epicardial Coronary Arteries in Children Five to Eight Years After Arterial Switch Operation: An Angiographic and Intracoronary Doppler Flow Wire Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1565 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, U. Kuhl, U. Rauch, B. Seeberg, and H.-P. Schultheiss Differential Aspects of Endothelial Function of the Coronary Microcirculation Considering Myocardial Virus Persistence, Endothelial Activation, and Myocardial Leukocyte Infiltrates Circulation, April 12, 2005; 111(14): 1784 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G S Werner, U Emig, P Bahrmann, M Ferrari, and H R Figulla Recovery of impaired microvascular function in collateral dependent myocardium after recanalisation of a chronic total coronary occlusion Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1303 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Voudris, D. Avramides, M. Koutelou, J. Malakos, A. Manginas, M. Papadakis, and D. V. Cokkinos Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1266 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Oskarsson, E. Pesonen, P. Munkhammar, S. Sandstrom, and P. Jogi Normal Coronary Flow Reserve After Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries: An Intracoronary Doppler Guidewire Study Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(13): 1696 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Vallbracht, P. L. Schwimmbeck, B. Seeberg, U. Kuhl, and H.-P. Schultheiss Endothelial dysfunction of peripheral arteries in patients with immunohistologically confirmed myocardial inflammation correlates with endothelial expression of human leukocyte antigens and adhesion molecules in myocardial biopsies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2002; 40(3): 515 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. De Bruyne, F. Hersbach, N. H.J. Pijls, J. Bartunek, J.-W. Bech, G. R. Heyndrickx, K. L. Gould, and W. Wijns Abnormal Epicardial Coronary Resistance in Patients With Diffuse Atherosclerosis but "Normal" Coronary Angiography Circulation, November 13, 2001; 104(20): 2401 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F Chirillo, A Bruni, G Balestra, C Cavallini, Z Olivari, J D Thomas, and P Stritoni Assessment of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein graft patency and flow reserve using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography Heart, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 424 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Werner, M. Ferrari, B. M. Richartz, O. Gastmann, and H. R. Figulla Microvascular Dysfunction in Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Circulation, September 4, 2001; 104(10): 1129 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kern and B. Meier Evaluation of the Culprit Plaque and the Physiological Significance of Coronary Atherosclerotic Narrowings Circulation, June 26, 2001; 103(25): 3142 - 3149. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Chareonthaitawee, P. A Kaufmann, O. Rimoldi, and P. G Camici Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2001; 50(1): 151 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lafont, J. L. Dubois-Rande, P. G. Steg, P. Dupouy, D. Carrie, P. Coste, A. Furber, F. Beygui, L. J. Feldman, S. Rahal, et al. The French randomized optimal stenting trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 404 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wieneke, M. Haude, J. Ge, C. Altmann, S. Kaiser, D. Baumgart, C. von Birgelen, D. Welge, and R. Erbel Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1713 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kern Coronary Physiology Revisited : Practical Insights From the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Kern, S. Puri, R. G. Bach, T. J. Donohue, P. Dupouy, E. A. Caracciolo, W. R. Craig, F. Aguirre, E. Aptecar, T. L. Wolford, et al. Abnormal Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve After Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients : Role of Relative Coronary Reserve to Assess Potential Mechanisms Circulation, December 21, 1999; 100(25): 2491 - 2498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Caiati, C. Montaldo, N. Zedda, R. Montisci, M. Ruscazio, G. Lai, M. Cadeddu, L. Meloni, and S. Iliceto Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: Comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1193 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. K. von Segesser Cardiopulmonary support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac assist Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 672 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lerman, J. C. Burnett Jr, S. T. Higano, L. J. McKinley, and D. R. Holmes Jr Long-term L-Arginine Supplementation Improves Small-Vessel Coronary Endothelial Function in Humans Circulation, June 2, 1998; 97(21): 2123 - 2128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Albertal, M. Voskuil, J.J. Piek, B. de Bruyne, G. Van Langenhove, P.I. Kay, M.A. Costa, E. Boersma, T. Beijsterveldt, J.E. Sousa, et al. Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve After Percutaneous Interventions Is Predictive of Periprocedural Outcome Circulation, April 2, 2002; 105(13): 1573 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]