Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:1024-1030
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grabitz, R.
Right arrow Articles by von Bernuth, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grabitz, R.
Right arrow Articles by von Bernuth, G

A small interventional device to occlude persistently patent ductus arteriosus in neonates: evaluation in piglets

RG Grabitz, MB Neuss, JY Coe, S Handt, DA Redel, and G von Bernuth

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Aachen University of Technology, Germany. grabitz@amsd.imib.rwth-aachen.de

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and tissue reaction of a new miniature interventional ductal occlusion device in neonatal pigs. BACKGROUND: A variety of devices are used to close persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA) by interventional measures. Because of the size of these devices, they have not been applied to term or preterm neonates. Newborn piglets are comparable in size and fragility to human term and preterm neonates. METHODS: Memory-shaped double-cone stainless steel coils were mounted on a titanium-nickel core wire. A snap-in mechanism attaches the coil to the delivery wire, allowing intravascular coil retrieval and repositioning. The system was placed through a 3F Teflon catheter. Two piglet models of PDA were used: 1) ductal patency maintained by stents (n = 6), and 2) ductal patency produced by angioplasty (n = 7) to avoid stent-coil interaction. RESULTS: Placement of the coils within the PDA was possible in all piglets. Before final detachment, the coils were retrieved or repositioned, or both, up to eight times. In all but two piglets the ductus was closed within 1 h of the procedure. The coils were never dislocated and caused no infections or relevant aortic and pulmonary artery obstruction (95% confidence interval for missing complications [0 of 13] extends to 23%). Histologic and electron microscopic studies revealed endothelial coverage of the implants and histiocytic reaction but no local or systemic inflammation or erosion of the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The device was effective in experimental models of PDA. The information obtained warrants initial trials of the device in neonates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. Francis, A. K. Singhi, S. Lakshmivenkateshaiah, and R. K. Kumar
Transcatheter Occlusion of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Pre-Term Infants
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2010; 3(5): 550 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T. Ino, K. Nishimoto, M. Okubo, and K. Yabuta
Recanalisation after coil embolisation of persistent ductus arteriosus
Heart, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 308 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement