JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:637-644
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Umans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P.

Clinical and angiographic comparison of matched patients with successful directional coronary atherectomy or stent implantation for primary coronary artery lesions

VA Umans, R Melkert, DP Foley, and PW Serruys

Catheterization Laboratory Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the long-term clinical and angiographic effects of successful directional atherectomy and stent implantation and to examine whether restenosis is related to the mechanism of lumen improvement as well as the extent of lumen gain. BACKGROUND: Directional atherectomy and coronary stent implantation have been shown to achieve a more optimal immediate result that may lead to a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and fewer target vessel revascularizations than does angioplasty. However, it remains to be determined whether one of the devices used in these interventions provides consistently better results than the other. METHODS: To allow meaningful comparisons a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with atherectomy were individually matched with a prospectively collected series of 117 patients successfully treated with stent implantation. Matching for baseline characteristics identified patients with identical lesion location and lesion severity, and immediate and late angiographic and clinical outcome were compared. To evaluate the possibility of a procedure effect on restenosis, patients were further matched for both immediate angiographic outcome and baseline characteristics, providing 150 matched patients for comparison. As confirmatory analysis, multivariate models were constructed to predict late lumen diameter. RESULTS: Matching resulted in two comparable groups with equivalent baseline clinical and stenosis characteristics (n = 117 pairs). Atherectomy led to a smaller immediate gain than stenting and, because late loss was similar in both groups, stenting resulted in a larger late lumen (1.96 +/- 0.51 vs. 1.66 +/- 0.55 mm, p < 0.0001). When patients were matched for immediate gain and baseline characteristics (n = 75 pairs), lumen loss was more pronounced after atherectomy, and thus the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up differed significantly between the two groups (1.66 +/- 0.53 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.47 mm, p = 0.004). This beneficial angiographic effect of stenting was accompanied by a reduced need for repeat interventions. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent effect of the interventional device used, whereby less loss and greater lumen diameter at follow-up were predicted for stent implantation than for atherectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Successful stent implantation provided a more favorable long-term angiographic outcome and lower rates of restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization than did atherectomy. This favorable effect of stenting not only is related to a larger, immediate gain, but also seems to attenuate late lumen loss.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Lansky, R. A. Costa, M. Mooney, M. G. Midei, H. K. Lui, W. Strickland, R. Mehran, M. B. Leon, M. E. Russell, S. G. Ellis, et al.
Gender-based outcomes after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1180 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. J. Lansky, R. A. Costa, G. S. Mintz, Y. Tsuchiya, M. Midei, D. A. Cox, C. O'Shaughnessy, R. A. Applegate, L. A. Cannon, M. Mooney, et al.
Non-Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Stents for the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions: Angiographic Follow-Up of the DELIVER Clinical Trial
Circulation, April 27, 2004; 109(16): 1948 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Tsuchikane, S. Sumitsuji, N. Awata, T. Nakamura, T. Kobayashi, M. Izumi, S. Otsuji, H. Tateyama, M. Sakurai, and T. Kobayashi
Final results of the STent versus directional coronary Atherectomy Randomized Trial (START)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1050 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. A. de Vrey, G. S. Mintz, C. von Birgelen, T. Kimura, M. Noboyoshi, J. J. Popma, P. W. Serruys, and M. B. Leon
Serial volumetric (three-dimensional) intravascular ultrasound analysis of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1874 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. O. Williams and M. C. Fahrenbach
Directional Coronary Atherectomy : But Wait, There's More
Circulation, February 3, 1998; 97(4): 309 - 311.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. S. Baim, D. E. Cutlip, S. K. Sharma, K. K. L. Ho, R. Fortuna, T. L. Schreiber, R. L. Feldman, J. Shani, C. Senerchia, Y. Zhang, et al.
Final Results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT)
Circulation, February 3, 1998; 97(4): 322 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.