JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:597-603
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L
Right arrow Articles by Kaski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, L
Right arrow Articles by Kaski, J.

Differential progression of complex culprit stenoses in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris

L Chen, MR Chester, R Crook, and JC Kaski

Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, England, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the evolution of complex culprit stenoses in patients with stable and those with unstable angina pectoris. BACKGROUND: Complex coronary stenoses are associated with adverse clinical and angiographic outcomes. However, it is not known whether the evolution of complex stenoses differs in unstable angina versus stable angina pectoris. METHODS: We prospectively assessed stenosis progression in 95 patients with unstable angina whose angina stabilized with medical therapy (Group 1) and 200 patients presenting with stable angina (Group 2). After diagnostic angiography, all patients were placed on a waiting list for coronary angioplasty and restudied at 8 +/- 4 (mean +/- SD) months later. In each patient the presumed culprit stenosis was identified and classified as complex (irregular borders, overhanging edges or thrombus) or smooth (absence of complex features). Stenosis progression, as assessed by computerized angiography, was defined as > or = 20% diameter reduction or new total occlusion. RESULTS: At the first angiogram, 364 stenoses > or = 50% and 383 stenoses < 50% were identified. At restudy, 36 (15%) of 236 stenoses progressed in 29 Group 1 patients and 36 (7%) of 502 stenoses in 31 Group 2 patients (p = 0.001). Forty-five (88%) of 51 stenoses > or = 50% and 6 (29%) of 21 stenoses < 50% that progressed developed to total coronary occlusion (p = 0.001). More culprit stenoses progressed in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.006), whereas progression of nonculprit stenoses was not significantly different in both groups. Culprit complex stenoses progressed more frequently in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.01). During follow-up, 3 patients died (myocardial infarction), and 51 had a nonfatal coronary event. Culprit stenoses progressed in 15 (54%) of the 28 patients with a nonfatal coronary event in Group 1 and in 9 (39%) of 23 patients in Group 2 (p = NS). Complex morphology (p < 0.001) and unstable angina at initial presentation (p < 0.01) were predictive factors for progression of culprit stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: A larger proportion of culprit complex stenoses progress in unstable angina than stable angina, and this is frequently associated with recurrence of coronary events.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Rioufol, M. Gilard, G. Finet, I. Ginon, J. Boschat, and X. Andre-Fouet
Evolution of Spontaneous Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture With Medical Therapy: Long-Term Follow-Up With Intravascular Ultrasound
Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2875 - 2880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
D.D. Waters and K.K. Khush
Management of the acute coronary syndrome patient
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2004; 6(suppl_C): C49 - C57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P J Sheridan and D C Crossman
Critical review of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2002; 78(926): 717 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. C. Sposito and M. J. Chapman
Statin Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Mechanistic Insight Into Clinical Benefit
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 22(10): 1524 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Rioufol, G. Finet, I. Ginon, X. Andre-Fouet, R. Rossi, E. Vialle, E. Desjoyaux, G. Convert, J.F. Huret, and A. Tabib
Multiple Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Three-Vessel Intravascular Ultrasound Study
Circulation, August 13, 2002; 106(7): 804 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. A. Kerensky, M. Wade, P. Deedwania, W. E. Boden, C. J. Pepine, and Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies
Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Goldstein
Angiographic plaque complexity: the tip of the unstable plaque iceberg
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1464 - 1467.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Pasterkamp, A. Vink, C. Borst, T. C. Wascher, A. deCampo, I. Schmoelzer, J. A. Goldstein, C. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
Multiple Complex Coronary Plaques in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., February 15, 2001; 344(7): 527 - 528.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. A. Goldstein, D. Demetriou, C. L. Grines, M. Pica, M. Shoukfeh, and W. W. O'Neill
Multiple Complex Coronary Plaques in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., September 28, 2000; 343(13): 915 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Tousoulis, G. Davies, C. Stefanadis, and P. Toutouzas
Can angiography predict the vulnerable lesion that progresses to myocardial infarction?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 261 - 262.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.