JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:580-584
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ganz, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ganz, P

Nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilation is not enhanced in patients with impaired endothelium-dependent dilation

TJ Anderson, IT Meredith, F Charbonneau, AC Yeung, M Dyce, AP Selwyn, and P Ganz

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether enhanced sensitivity to exogenous nitrovasodilators is present in the coronary arteries of patients with impaired endothelium-dependent dilation. BACKGROUND: Animal studies have demonstrated that the dilator response to exogenous nitrovasodilators is exaggerated in the setting of endothelial dysfunction (diminished nitric oxide activity). Whether such relative hyperresponsiveness to exogenous nitrates occurs and is important in humans is unknown. METHODS: We assessed coronary vasomotion in 110 patients (mean [+/- SD] age 56 +/- 10 years) by serial intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (10(-8) to 10(-6) mol/liter) to test endogenous nitric oxide and nitroglycerin (40 micrograms) to test responses to exogenous nitrovasodilators. RESULTS: The vasomotor response to 10(-6) mol/liter of acetylcholine differed between patients with (n = 95) and those without (n = 15) normal endothelial dysfunction (-21 +/- 14% vs. 12 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.001). However, neither the dilator response to nitroglycerin (21 +/- 14% vs. 18 +/- 13%) nor the baseline diameter differed between those with endothelial dysfunction and normal function, respectively. There was no correlation between the magnitude of the dilator response to nitroglycerin and acetylcholine. The response to nitroglycerin was decreased with increasing age (r = -0.21, p = 0.03) but was not related to any other demographic factors or to the angiographic appearance of the vessel. CONCLUSIONS: The coronary vasodilator response to nitroglycerin is not significantly enhanced in patients with impaired endothelium-dependent dilation but decreases with increasing age. This finding provides indirect evidence that basal coronary tone is not increased in patients with endothelial dysfunction and that supersensitivity to exogenous nitrates is not clinically important in humans.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Terashima, C. H. Meyer, B. G. Keeffe, E. J. Putz, E. de la Pena-Almaguer, P. C. Yang, B. S. Hu, D. G. Nishimura, and M. V. McConnell
Noninvasive assessment of coronary vasodilation using magnetic resonance angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. Marijic, Q. Li, M. Song, K. Nishimaru, E. Stefani, and L. Toro
Decreased Expression of Voltage- and Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels in Coronary Smooth Muscle During Aging
Circ. Res., February 2, 2001; 88(2): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. R. Adams, J. Robinson, R. McCredie, J. P. Seale, K. E. Sorensen, J. E. Deanfield, and D. S. Celermajer
Smooth muscle dysfunction occurs independently of impaired endothelium-dependent dilation in adults at risk of atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.