Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 28:400-410
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bardy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, W

Multicenter experience with a pectoral unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Active Can Investigators

GH Bardy, R Yee, and W Jung

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine in a multicenter study the methods of use, efficacy and complications of a unipolar cardioverter-defibrillator in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. BACKGROUND: Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in the pectoral region offers a significant opportunity to improve the management of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias. Unipolar, single-lead, pectoral implantable cardioverter-defibrillators might decrease related mortality, morbidity and costs in the care of such patients. METHODS: From November 3, 1993 to May 8, 1995, a unipolar defibrillator (Medtronic model 7219C) was selected for use in 473 patients from 74 centers (386 [82%] men, 87 [18%] women; mean [+/- SD] age 59 +/- 13 years, range 16 to 88). The clinical indication for use was ventricular fibrillation in 157 patients, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 236, both ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in 53 and syncope or inducible ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 27. Coronary artery disease was present in 323 patients (68%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.36 +/- 0.15 (range 0.10 to 0.85). The distribution of New York Heart Association congestive heart failure was class I = 34%; class II = 45%; class III = 17%; and class IV = 2%. RESULTS: The unipolar cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted successfully in 464 (98%) of 473 candidates. Effective defibrillation occurred with the first shock polarity tested in 88% of patients, after a polarity switch in 8% and after lead or generator repositioning in 2%. The stored energy defibrillation threshold was obtained at implantation in 339 patients (72%) and was 11.5 +/- 6.1 J, with 72% of patients having a defibrillation threshold < or = 12 J. The mean "skin-to-skin" implantation time was 96 +/- 45 min (range 25 to 335 min). Complications occurred in 29 patients (6%). Device therapy for 2,160 spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation episodes occurred in 128 patients (27%) over a 2,732 device-month experience (range 0 to 17.2) and was effective in 98.7% of episodes. There were 14 deaths (10 nonsudden cardiac, 3 sudden cardiac, 1 noncardiac). Cumulative survival, on an intention-to-treat basis from all causes of death at 17.2 months, was 94.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Unipolar pectoral implantable cardioverter-defibrillators can be inserted with a high likelihood of success in a relatively brief procedure. Defibrillation thresholds are low, morbidity is modest, and survival rates are good with this new type of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. Lemke, T. Lawo, M. Zarse, A. Lubinski, U. Kreutzer, J. Mueller, A. Schuchert, S. Mitzenheim, D. Danilovic, T. Deneke, et al.
Patient-tailored implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing using the upper limit of vulnerability: the TULIP protocol
Europace, August 1, 2008; 10(8): 907 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Ellenbogen, M. A. Wood, R. K. Shepard, H. F. Clemo, T. Vaughn, K. Holloman, M. Dow, J. Leffler, A. Abeyratne, and D. Verness
Detection and management of animplantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure: Incidence and clinical implications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 73 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Committee Members, G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2002; 40(9): 1703 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Gregoratos, J. Abrams, A. E. Epstein, R. A. Freedman, D. L. Hayes, M. A. Hlatky, R. E. Kerber, G. V. Naccarelli, M. H. Schoenfeld, M. J. Silka, et al.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2145 - 2161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. A. L. E. Bracke, A. Meijer, and L. M. van Gelder
Malfunction of endocardial defibrillator leads and lead extraction: where do they meet?
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 19 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow
Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillators Without Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation
Circulation, May 1, 2001; 103(17): 2159 - 2164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. H. Gollob and J. J. Seger
Current Status of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Chest, April 1, 2001; 119(4): 1210 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. Schulte, J. Sperzel, J. Carlsson, T. Schwarz, W. Ehrlich, H. F. Pitschner, and J. Neuzner
Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements
Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 177 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
K. Glatter and L. B. Liem
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Current Progress and Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 162 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Greene, D. Newman, M. Geist, M. Paquette, D. Heng, and P. Dorian
Is electrical storm in ICD patients the sign of a dying heart?: Outcome of patients with clusters of ventricular tachyarrhythmias
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(3): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. P Causer and D. T Connelly
Implantable defibrillators for life threatening ventricular arrhythmias
BMJ, September 19, 1998; 317(7161): 762 - 763.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff
Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System
Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4400 - 4407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow, J. E. Brewer, R. M. Kass, and M. W. Kroll
Application of Models of Defibrillation to Human Defibrillation Data : Implications for Optimizing Implantable Defibrillator Capacitance
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2813 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow, C. T. Peter, R. M. Kass, E. S. Gang, W. J. Mandel, C. Hwang, D. J. Martin, and P.-S. Chen
Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on the Basis of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1497 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement