Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:1693-1697
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, Y
Right arrow Articles by Miyatake, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, Y
Right arrow Articles by Miyatake, K

Serial doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position

Y Kobayashi, S Nagata, F Ohmori, K Eishi, K Nakano, and K Miyatake

Department of Internal Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate bioprosthetic valve dysfunction in the tricuspid position by serial Doppler echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Few reports on the long-term results of tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthetic valves are evaluated by serial Doppler echocardiography. METHODS: Between September 1979 and December 1993, 95 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthetic valves at our facility. Sixty patients who underwent serial Doppler echocardiographic examination at intervals of at least 2 years after operation were included in the final analysis. These patients were followed up from 1.5 to 13.0 years (mean 5.8 +/- 2.5). RESULTS: The actuarial rates of freedom from bioprosthetic valve stenosis and regurgitation at 10 years were 46% and 51%, respectively. The prevalence of bioprosthetic valve stenosis and regurgitation increased progressively in a linear manner beginning 1 or 2 years after tricuspid valve replacement. Right heart failure developed during follow-up in 20 of the 25 patients with bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position was substantially lower in our study than that reported in previous studies. Tricuspid bioprosthetic valve dysfunction increased progressively in a linear manner beginning 1 to 2 years after tricuspid valve replacement.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The EAE Textbook of EchocardiographyHome page
J. B. Chambers and J.-L. Vanoverschelde
Chapter 15 Replacement heart valves
The EAE Textbook of Echocardiography, March 1, 2011; 1(1): med-9780199599639-chapter - med-9780199599639-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. P. Ratnatunga, M.-B. Edwards, C. J. Dore, and K. M. Taylor
Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 1940 - 1947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement