Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:1471-1477
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naegeli, B
Right arrow Articles by Burkart, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naegeli, B
Right arrow Articles by Burkart, F

Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones

B Naegeli, S Osswald, M Deola, and F Burkart

Cardiac Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate possible interactions between digital mobile telephones and implanted pacemakers. BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic fields may interfere with normal pacemaker function. Development of bipolar sensing leads and modern noise filtering techniques have lessened this problem. However, it remains unclear whether these features also protect from high frequency noise arising from digital cellular phones. METHODS: In 39 patients with an implanted pacemaker (14 dual-chamber [DDD], 8 atrial-synchronized ventricular-inhibited [VDD(R)] and 17 ventricular-inhibited [VVI(R)] pacemakers), four mobile phones with different levels of power output (2 and 8 W) were tested in the standby, dialing and operating mode. During continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, 672 tests were performed in each mode with the phones positioned over the pulse generator, the atrial and the ventricular electrode tip. The tests were carried out at different sensitivity settings and, where possible, in the unipolar and bipolar pacing modes as well. RESULTS: In 7 (18%) of 39 patients, a reproducible interference was induced during 26 (3.9%) of 672 tests with the operating phones in close proximity (<10 cm) to the pacemaker. In 22 dual-chamber (14 DDD, 8 VDD) pacemakers, atrial triggering occurred in 7 (2.8%) of 248 and ventricular inhibition in 5 (2.8%) of 176 tests. In 17 VVI(R) systems, pacemaker inhibition was induced in 14 (5.6%) of 248 tests. Interference was more likely to occur at higher power output of the phone and at maximal sensitivity of the pacemakers (maximal vs. nominal sensitivity, 6% vs. 1.8% positive test results, p = 0.009). When the bipolar and unipolar pacing modes were compared in the same patients, ventricular inhibition was induced only in the unipolar mode (12.5% positive test results, p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Digital mobile phones in close proximity to implanted pacemakers may cause intermittent pacemaker dysfunction with inappropriate ventricular tracking and potentially dangerous pacemaker inhibition.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
W. Marchant
Pacemakers and defibrillators: anaesthetic implications
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 875 - 875.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. Hekmat, B. Salemink, G. Lauterbach, R.H.G. Schwinger, M. Südkamp, H.J. Weber, and U. Mehlhorn
Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update
Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(4): 363 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Kolb, S. Schmieder, G.u. Lehmann, B. Zrenner, M. R. Karch, A. Plewan, and C. Schmitt
Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2054 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. G Myerson and A. R J Mitchell
Mobile phones in hospitals
BMJ, March 1, 2003; 326(7387): 460 - 461.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M. NIEHAUS and J. TEBBENJOHANNS
Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators
Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 246 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Santini
Digital cellular telephones and ICDs
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2001; 22(15): 1251 - 1252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Roelke and A. D. Bernstein
Cardiac Pacemakers and Cellular Telephones
N. Engl. J. Med., May 22, 1997; 336(21): 1518 - 1519.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Pacemaker Dysfunction Due to Mobile Telephones
Journal Watch Cardiology, August 1, 1996; 1996(801): 12 - 12.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal Watch DermatologyHome page
Digital Cellular Phones: A Potential Hazard for Pacemaker Function
Journal Watch Dermatology, July 1, 1996; 1996(701): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement