JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:1257-1263
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, P
Right arrow Articles by Keane, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, P
Right arrow Articles by Keane, J.

Midterm results of balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis: predictors of success

P Moore, E Egito, H Mowrey, SB Perry, JE Lock, and JF Keane

Children's Hospital, Boston and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

OBJECTIVES. We evaluated patient and procedural characteristics that influence the midterm success of balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis. BACKGROUND. Balloon dilation is a new treatment for congenital aortic stenosis. Factors that influence midterm success are unknown. METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 148 children >1 month old who underwent balloon dilation for aortic stenosis. RESULTS. Balloon dilation was successful in 87% of patients, with a procedural mortality rate of 0.7%. The average immediate peak to peak gradient reduction was 56.4 +/- 19.9% (mean +/- SD). Prior valvotomy was the only factor that significantly reduced the immediate gradient reduction after dilation (47.1 +/- 21.8% vs. 57.8 +/- 19.6%, p < 0.01). Survival after dilation was 95% at 8 years. Seventy-five percent of patients were free of repeat intervention 4 years after dilation, whereas 50% remained free of repeat intervention at 8 years. Asymmetrically thick valve leaflets (risk ratio [RR] 0.17, p < 0.01) and prior aortic valvotomy (RR 0.35, p = 0.02) decreased the risk of repeat intervention. Aortic regurgitation grade > or = 3 (RR 4.27, p = 0.04) and residual gradient after dilation (RR 1.63 for 10 mm Hg, p < 0.01) increased the risk. CONCLUSIONS. The 8-year survival rate after dilation was 95% with 50% of patients free of repeat intervention. Factors that increased the risk for repeat intervention included symmetrically thin or thick aortic valve leaflets, regurgitation grade > or = 3 after dilation and a high residual gradient after dilation. The incidence of repeat intervention after dilation was high owing to its palliative nature.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc InterventHome page
D. W. Brown, E. C. Chong, K. Gauvreau, J. F. Keane, J. E. Lock, and A. C. Marshall
Aortic Wall Injury as a Complication of Neonatal Aortic Valvuloplasty: Incidence and Risk Factors
Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Fratz, H. P. Gildein, G. Balling, W. Sebening, T. Genz, A. Eicken, and J. Hess
Aortic Valvuloplasty in Pediatric Patients Substantially Postpones the Need for Aortic Valve Surgery: A Single-Center Experience of 188 Patients After up to 17.5 Years of Follow-Up
Circulation, March 4, 2008; 117(9): 1201 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kadner, O. Raisky, A. Degandt, D. Tamisier, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. R. Vouhe
The Ross Procedure in Infants and Young Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. B. McElhinney, J. E. Lock, J. F. Keane, A. M. Moran, and S. D. Colan
Left Heart Growth, Function, and Reintervention After Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Neonatal Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, February 1, 2005; 111(4): 451 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Karamlou, I. Shen, B. Alsoufia, G. Burch, M. Reller, M. Silberbach, and R. M. Ungerleider
The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30-year results from a single institution
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 81 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J D R Thomson
Management of valvar aortic stenosis in children
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 5 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
O Reich, P Tax, J Marek, V Razek, J Gilik, V Tomek, V Chaloupecky, H Bartakova, and J Skovranek
Long term results of percutaneous balloon valvoplasty of congenital aortic stenosis: independent predictors of outcome
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Balmer, M Beghetti, M Fasnacht, B Friedli, and U Arbenz
Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common
Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 77 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. S. Bhabra, R. Dhillon, S. Bhudia, B. Sethia, P. Miller, O. Stumper, J. G. C. Wright, J. V. De Giovanni, D. J. Barron, and W. J. Brawn
Surgical aortic valvotomy in infancy: impact of leaflet morphology on long-term outcomes
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1412 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. W. McCrindle, E. H. Blackstone, W. G. Williams, R. Sittiwangkul, T. L. Spray, A. Azakie, and R. A. Jonas
Are Outcomes of Surgical Versus Transcatheter Balloon Valvotomy Equivalent in Neonatal Critical Aortic Stenosis?
Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104(90001): I-152 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. A. Bacha, G. M. Satou, A. M. Moran, D. Zurakowski, G. R. Marx, J. F. Keane, and R. A. Jonas
Valve-sparing operation for balloon-induced aortic regurgitation in congenital aortic stenosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2001; 122(1): 162 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. K. Lofland, B. W. McCrindle, W. G. Williams, E. H. Blackstone, C. I. Tchervenkov, R. Sittiwangkul, and R. A. Jonas
Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: A multi-institutional study of management, outcomes, and risk factors
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2001; 121(1): 0010 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J. L Gibbs
CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Interventional catheterisation. Opening up I: the ventricular outflow tracts and great arteries
Heart, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 111 - 115.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Borghi, G Agnoletti, O Valsecchi, and M Carminati
Aortic balloon dilatation for congenital aortic stenosis: report of 90 cases (1986-98)
Heart, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 10e - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Hawkins, L. L. Minich, L. Y. Tani, R. W. Day, V. E. Judd, R. E. Shaddy, and E. C. McGough
Late Results and Reintervention After Aortic Valvotomy for Critical Aortic Stenosis in Neonates and Infants
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1758 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. Allen, R. H. Beekman III, A. Garson Jr, Z. M. Hijazi, C. Mullins, M. P. O'Laughlin, and K. A. Taubert
Pediatric Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterization : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association
Circulation, February 17, 1998; 97(6): 609 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.