Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:1156-1161
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.

Ergonovine echocardiography as a screening test for diagnosis of vasospastic angina before coronary angiography

JK Song, SJ Lee, DH Kang, SS Cheong, MK Hong, JJ Kim, SW Park, and SJ Park

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.

OBJECTIVES. In patients with chest pain suggestive of variant angina, we performed this prospective study to test the specificity and diagnostic validity of ergonovine echocardiography (detection of regional wall motion abnormality during bedside ergonovine challenge) as a screening procedure before coronary angiography. BACKGROUND. Spasm provocation test outside the catheterization room has generally not been accepted as a safe diagnostic method. METHODS. Ergonovine echocardiography was performed in 80 consecutive patients with chest pain syndrome after confirmation of negative treadmill or normal stress myocardial perfusion scan results using thallium-201. A bolus of ergonovine maleate was injected at 5-min intervals up to a total cumulative dosage of 0.35 mg with echocardiographic monitoring of left ventricular wall motion. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was also recorded every 3 min after each ergonovine injection. Positive test results were development of regional wall motion abnormalities or transient ST segment elevation or depression >0.1 mV in any single lead of the 12-lead ECG. Coronary angiography was undertaken within 2 +/- 4 days (mean +/- SD) after ergonovine echocardiography, and the spasm provocation test with acetylcholine or ergonovine was performed in patients with normal angiographic findings or lumen diameter narrowing <70%. RESULTS. On the basis of angiographic criteria, 56 patients had coronary vasospasm; this finding was later ruled out in 19 patients with near-normal angiographic results by a negative response on the spasm provocation test. In the remaining five patients, coronary spasm provocation was not performed because they revealed a high degree of fixed stenosis (lumen diameter narrowing 97 +/- 4%). Ergonovine echocardiography could diagnose coronary vasospasm before angiography, with a sensitivity of 91% (51 of 56 patients, 95% confidence interval [CI] 84% TO 98%) and specificity of 88% (21 of 24 patients, 95% CI 75% to 100%). Of 53 patients showing regional wall motion abnormalities during ergonovine echocardiography, characteristic ST segment elevation in the simultaneously recorded ECG was observed in only 20 (38%). There were no complications, including myocardial infarction or fatal arrhythmia, during the test. CONCLUSIONS. Ergonovine echocardiography before coronary angiography is safe and can be used as a reliable diagnostic screening test for coronary vasospasm in patients with negative treadmill or normal stress myocardial perfusion scan results. These findings suggest that invasive coronary angiography can be avoided in selected patients for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The EAE Textbook of EchocardiographyHome page
L. Cortigiani and E. Picano
Chapter 13 Stress echocardiography
The EAE Textbook of Echocardiography, March 1, 2011; 1(1): med-9780199599639-chapter - med-9780199599639-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi
Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
P. K. Mishra
Variations in presentation and various options in management of variant angina
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 748 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.-K. Song, S.-W. Park, D.-H. Kang, M.-K. Hong, J.-J. Kim, C.-W. Lee, and S.-J. Park
Safety and clinical impact of ergonovine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary vasospasm
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1850 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. K. Hamilton and C. J. Pepine
A renaissance of provocative testing for coronary spasm?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1857 - 1859.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al.
ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement