|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:757-765 © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Cardiology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
The technique of intracoronary stenting has achieved remarkable progress over the last few years. Improved stent deployment techniques and optimization of postprocedural management have dramatically improved the safety of intracoronary stent placement. At present, the incidence of early vessel closure after stenting is even lower than that after standard angioplasty and, as most operators no longer prescribe aggressive anticoagulation, bleeding complications are uncommon. Stenting has become an extremely effective treatment for abrupt or threatened vessel closure or for any suboptimal angiographic result during conventional angioplasty. Furthermore, large prospective trials have demonstrated that its efficacy is superior to that of conventional angioplasty for primary restenosis prevention in focal lesions of some native coronary arteries. Ongoing trials tend to extrapolate these conclusions to saphenous vein graft lesions. Mechanical support of the vessel wall explains the sustained angiographic benefit observed after stenting. Future developments may include the use of stents as a vehicle for local drug delivery in an attempt to further reduce the incidence of restenosis. In view of these results, coronary stents should be considered a new standard therapeutic modality in interventional cardiology.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. J. Schoen and R. F. Padera Jr. Cardiac Surgical Pathology Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 119 - 185. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Atalar, K. Aytemir, I. Haznedaroglu, S. Aksoyek, K. Ovunc,, S. Kirazli, and F. Ozmen Platelet and Leukocyte Deactivation After Intracoronary Stent Placement in Patients Receiving Combined Antiplatelet Therapy Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. W. ROBERTS and S. W. REDDING CORONARY ARTERY STENTS: REVIEW AND PATIENT-MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2000; 131(6): 797 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. von Schacky n-3 Fatty acids and the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis1 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2000; 71(1): 224S - 227S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C I O BROOKES and U SIGWART Taming platelets in coronary stenting: ticlopidine out, clopidogrel in? Heart, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 651 - 652. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Herz, A. Assali, A. Solodky, N. Shor, T. Ben-Gal, Y. Adler, and Y. Birnbaum Coronary Stent Deployment Without Predilation in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Feasible, Safe, and Effective Technique Angiology, November 1, 1999; 50(11): 901 - 908. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Assali, Y. Adler, A. Solodky, N. Shor, T. Ben-Gal, S. Sclarovsky, A. Pardes, and I. Herz Coronary Stent Deployment Without Predilation: Prevention of Complications of Venous Graft Angioplasty Angiology, August 1, 1998; 49(8): 613 - 617. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K K HAASE, A BAUMBACH, and K R KARSCH Stents are used too often Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 541 - 542. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. J. Rupprecht, H. Darius, U. Borkowski, T. Voigtlander, B. Nowak, S. Genth, and J. Meyer Comparison of Antiplatelet Effects of Aspirin, Ticlopidine, or Their Combination After Stent Implantation Circulation, March 24, 1998; 97(11): 1046 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Crawley, A. Clifton, H. Markus, and M. M. Brown Delayed Improvement in Carotid Artery Diameter After Carotid Angioplasty Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 574 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
