|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:543-551 © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Medicine, Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospitals, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether preprocedural lesion morphology differentially affects the outcome of directional coronary atherectomy versus standard balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Despite previous studies (Canadian Coronary Atherectomy Trial [CCAT]/Coronary Angioplasty Verus Excisional Atherectomy Trial [CAVEAT]), directional coronary atherectomy continues to be recommended on the basis of lesion-specific features, although the validity of this approach has never been proved. METHODS: A retrospective, subgroup analysis of the CCAT data base (group average +/- SD) was performed. RESULTS: In the long term (6 months), both procedures were equally successful in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (directional atherectomy 0.62 +/- 0.70 mm vs. coronary angioplasty 0.70 +/- 0.72 mm, p = NS), with atherectomy tending to perform best in relatively "simple" lesions (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [ACC/AHA] type A: atherectomy 0.57 +/- 0.70 mm vs. angioplasty 0.50 +/- 0.77 mm; ACC/AHA type B1: atherectomy 0.65 +/- 0.68 mm vs. angioplasty 0.60 +/- 0.68 mm) and those with moderate dystrophic calcification (atherectomy 0.79 +/- 0.56 mm vs. angioplasty 0.45 +/- 0.73 mm). Although greatest minimal lumen diameter gains were seen in larger (> 3 mm) coronary arteries (atherectomy 0.76 +/- 0.62 mm vs angioplasty 0.80 +/- 0.72 mm, p = NS) and those with severe obstruction (preprocedural minimal lumen diameter < 1.0 mm: atherectomy 0.80 +/- 0.62 mm vs. angioplasty 0.84 +/- 0.63 mm, p = NS), neither technique was superior, and eccentric stenoses (symmetry index < 0.5) had similar outcomes (atherectomy 0.59 +/- 0.49 mm vs. angioplasty 0.62 +/- 0.65 mm, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These data refute many preconceptions regarding the choice of directional coronary atherectomy on the basis of anatomic criteria.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Koning, H. Eltchaninoff, P. Commeau, K. Khalife, M. Gilard, J. Lipiecki, P. Coste, M. Bedossa, T. Lefevre, P. Brunel, et al. Stent Placement Compared With Balloon Angioplasty for Small Coronary Arteries: In-Hospital and 6-Month Clinical and Angiographic Results Circulation, October 2, 2001; 104(14): 1604 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Giri, P. D. Thompson, F. J. Kiernan, J. Clive, D. B. Fram, J. F. Mitchel, J. A. Hirst, R. G. McKay, and D. D. Waters Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics of Exertion-Related Acute Myocardial Infarction JAMA, November 10, 1999; 282(18): 1731 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, S. Elezi, J. Dirschinger, J. Mehilli, H. Schuhlen, R. Blasini, and F.-J. Neumann Prognostic Value of the Modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stenosis Morphology Classification for Long-Term Angiographic and Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stent Placement Circulation, September 21, 1999; 100(12): 1285 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Beleslin, M. Ostojic, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, R. Babic, M. Nedeljkovic, G. Stankovic, S. Stojkovic, J. Marinkovic, I. Nedeljkovic, J. Stepanovic, et al. Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |