JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996; 27:449-452
© 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pagan-Carlo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pagan-Carlo, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kerber, R.

Transthoracic defibrillation: importance of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female breast

LA Pagan-Carlo, KT Spencer, CE Robertson, A Dengler, C Birkett, and RE Kerber

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospital, Iowa City 52242, USA.

OBJECTIVES. This study sought to determine the effect on transthoracic impedance of placement of defibrillation electrodes on the female breast versus adjacent to or under the breast. BACKGROUND. Transthoracic impedance is a major determinant of transthoracic current flow in defibrillation. For a given energy setting, a high transthoracic impedance reduces current flow and may adversely affect the ability of electric shocks to accomplish defibrillation. We hypothesized that the increased interelectrode tissue associated with placement of the apex defibrillation electrode on the female breast would result in increased transthoracic impedance compared with electrode placement lateral to or under the breast. METHOD. Transthoracic impedance was measured noninvasively by passing a 5-V, 31.25-kHz square wave current through the chest and comparing the low level current flow to known references. We measured transthoracic impedance associated with three different apex defibrillation electrode positions--on the breast, under the breast and lateral to the breast--in 25 women (brassiere size 34A to 48C, 25 to 75 years old, body weight 128 to 328 lb [58 to 148 kg] and 2 men. The measurements were taken with a modified defibrillator that accurately predicts transthoracic impedance without delivering an actual shock. The measurement sequence was random. RESULTS. The average measured transthoracic impedance with placement of the apex defibrillation electrode on the breast was 95 +/- 25 ohms (mean +/- SD), under the breast 84 +/- 17* ohms and lateral to the breast 83 +/- 20* ohms (asterisk indicates p < 0.01 vs. on the breast by analysis of variance). The study cohort was also classified into two groups: large breasted (brassiere size > or = 40) and small breasted (brassiere size < or = 39). The measured transthoracic impedances for the large-breasted group were 112 +/- 20 ohms for on the breast, 94 +/- 13* ohms for under the breast and 98 +/- 19* ohms for lateral to the breast. For the small breasted group, the similar transthoracic impedance measurements were 81 +/- 21, 77 +/- 16 and 71 +/- 13* ohms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. In women, placement of the apex defibrillation electrode on the breast results in higher transthoracic impedance, which will reduce current flow. We recommend placing the apex electrode lateral to or underneath the breast.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 3: Defibrillation
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-17 - III-24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G W N Dalzell
Determinants of successful defibrillation
Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 405 - 407.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
Advanced Life Support Working Group of the Europea
The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support
BMJ, June 20, 1998; 316(7148): 1863 - 1869.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.